500 to 510 conversion?

Forum for people who are new to woodworking. Feel free to ask questions or contribute.

Moderator: admin

User avatar
jtevans
Gold Member
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:12 pm
Location: Evans, WV.

500 to 510 conversion?

Post by jtevans »

I'm picking up parts (Ebay) to convert my 500 machine to a 510. I have instructions to convert a 500 to a 520, but not to a 510. It is my understanding that a video was available, through Shopsmith, for those wishing to convert to the 510 upgrade?...or are there other materials available that help explain this process?
User avatar
joshh
Platinum Member
Posts: 723
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 8:53 pm
Location: Dallas / Fort Worth, Texas

Post by joshh »

There isn't much for instruction but it should be the same as the 520. The rails are different but the tables and carriage are all the same. Replace all the components and align the table.

http://www.shopsmith.com/ownersite/catalog/500to510.htm
User avatar
jtevans
Gold Member
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:12 pm
Location: Evans, WV.

Post by jtevans »

joshh wrote:There isn't much for instruction but it should be the same as the 520. The rails are different but the tables and carriage are all the same. Replace all the components and align the table.

http://www.shopsmith.com/ownersite/catalog/500to510.htm
Thanks for the quick comeback. After reading the 500-to-520 conversion I'm clear on what is to be done there, I was just curious if there was anything further to understand with the "other" conversion. My equipment hasn't arrived yet, so I've got plenty of time to study up on the work involved...

Thanks again for the comeback...JIM.
garys
Platinum Member
Posts: 2075
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 12:16 am
Location: Bismarck, ND

Post by garys »

There is a 500 to 510 dvd available somewhere. I got one when I bought my conversion from Shopsmith. I don't know where it is today.


This might be the one that came with my 510 conversion. Or, at least, it should be similar.

http://www.shopsmith.com/ownersite/cata ... 0to520.htm
kalynzoo
Platinum Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 11:02 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Post by kalynzoo »

When I purchased my SS at a State Fair demo many years ago, I purchased a factory upgraded demo. A 505 upgraded to a 510. It was shipped fully assembled, thank goodness, so I'm not much help with the conversion. However I still have the complete binders for operation and adjustment.
Gary Kalyn
Kalynzoo Productions
Woodworking
Porter Ranch/Northridge
Los Angeles, CA
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35600
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Post by JPG »

Be aware there are two versions of 510 tables and rails. More than likely yours will be the later version, but it is imperative than all the pieces are from the same version.

The older version has holes in the front of the rails to access screws that screw into tapped holes in the tables.

The jack screws are smaller on the older version.

The newer version has kep nuts securing the rails from under the table and has studs attached to the rails.

The center screw/stud is located differently on the two versions.
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
User avatar
joshh
Platinum Member
Posts: 723
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 8:53 pm
Location: Dallas / Fort Worth, Texas

Post by joshh »

JPG40504 wrote:The center screw/stud is located differently on the two versions.

Is that true for only the main table or also the floating tables?
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35600
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Post by JPG »

joshh wrote:Is that true for only the main table or also the floating tables?
Only the main table has a 'center' screw of three on each end.;)
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
User avatar
dusty
Platinum Member
Posts: 21530
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona

Post by dusty »

JPG40504 wrote:Be aware there are two versions of 510 tables and rails. More than likely yours will be the later version, but it is imperative than all the pieces are from the same version.

The older version has holes in the front of the rails to access screws that screw into tapped holes in the tables.

The jack screws are smaller on the older version.

The newer version has kep nuts securing the rails from under the table and has studs attached to the rails.

The center screw/stud is located differently on the two versions.

This is all true but you did not mention the OD of the 510 rails. Is the OD on the two versions the same?

Even though I know that a couple members of this forum have had some real difficult times trying to align tables, I am not convinced that their problems were caused solely by the mix of 510 rails.

Who, amongst the membership of this illustrious group, has compared the physical characteristics of one version with the other. I would do so but I have never even seen a set of older table rails (those with through holes rather than studs).
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
User avatar
joshh
Platinum Member
Posts: 723
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 8:53 pm
Location: Dallas / Fort Worth, Texas

Post by joshh »

dusty wrote:This is all true but you did not mention the OD of the 510 rails. Is the OD on the two versions the same?

Even though I know that a couple members of this forum have had some real difficult times trying to align tables, I am not convinced that their problems were caused solely by the mix of 510 rails.

Who, amongst the membership of this illustrious group, has compared the physical characteristics of one version with the other. I would do so but I have never even seen a set of older table rails (those with through holes rather than studs).

The OD is the same, but the ID is different.

Here is more detail including a side by side of the floating tables: http://www.shopsmith.net/forums/showthr ... light=1986
Post Reply