Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 2:02 pm
The 505, 510, and 520 tables are essentially the same. The difference being how the floating tubes, fence etc are mounted.
The 505+ Table is larger than the 500 Main Table.
Fence mounting while workable on a 500 is not as good as the methods used in the 505+.
The safety features on the 505+ are much better thought out than the 500. Ultimately safety is always in your control and no safety device makes a machine inherently safe. You just have to pay a lot more attention on the 500. I usually run without any of the safety devices (Except the lower saw guard, it does help in dust control) on the table saw relying instead on my experience and extra attention during setup especially parallelism of the fence.
Drawbacks of the 500 system as I see and experience them.
The fence is not that great. Workable but not as nice as some of the more modern designs.
Adjusting the fence 4-6" or so from the blade on the 500 is an extreme hassle (Whenever the fence needs to straddle both the main table and the extension table to maintain the desired width) I always have trouble getting it parallel to the blade in this configuration. It's doable, it just takes me a bit. Maybe it's my particular aux tables or my particular arrangement setup, but it really is a hassle for me.
When width of cut is large enough that that the fence sits on the aux table,
The lack of the floating table configuration makes adjusting width of cut a hassle as you have to adjust the entire headstock and table to set the width. Again, doable, just inconvenient. (But not as bad as when the fence has to straddle both)
When the width of cut is in a place where the entire fence is on the main table adjusting is as easy as any fence.
If you're not going to use the table saw functionality or use it for small stock then there really is no difference between the different models.
Personally, I limit my table saw usage as much as possible. About the only time use it now is for multiple identical parts and repeatable cuts. If I'm doing one off stuff, I usually stick to hand tools.
The 505+ Table is larger than the 500 Main Table.
Fence mounting while workable on a 500 is not as good as the methods used in the 505+.
The safety features on the 505+ are much better thought out than the 500. Ultimately safety is always in your control and no safety device makes a machine inherently safe. You just have to pay a lot more attention on the 500. I usually run without any of the safety devices (Except the lower saw guard, it does help in dust control) on the table saw relying instead on my experience and extra attention during setup especially parallelism of the fence.
Drawbacks of the 500 system as I see and experience them.
The fence is not that great. Workable but not as nice as some of the more modern designs.
Adjusting the fence 4-6" or so from the blade on the 500 is an extreme hassle (Whenever the fence needs to straddle both the main table and the extension table to maintain the desired width) I always have trouble getting it parallel to the blade in this configuration. It's doable, it just takes me a bit. Maybe it's my particular aux tables or my particular arrangement setup, but it really is a hassle for me.
When width of cut is large enough that that the fence sits on the aux table,
The lack of the floating table configuration makes adjusting width of cut a hassle as you have to adjust the entire headstock and table to set the width. Again, doable, just inconvenient. (But not as bad as when the fence has to straddle both)
When the width of cut is in a place where the entire fence is on the main table adjusting is as easy as any fence.
If you're not going to use the table saw functionality or use it for small stock then there really is no difference between the different models.
Personally, I limit my table saw usage as much as possible. About the only time use it now is for multiple identical parts and repeatable cuts. If I'm doing one off stuff, I usually stick to hand tools.
