Shopsmith Inc. quality of sources
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 5:47 pm
I think it is fair to say that Shopsmith tools have a reputation for quality. I believe that reputation was first built by Magna Engineering and Magna Corporation. That reputation and the customer base is one of the things that made the Shopsmith Inc. revival viable. The tools' have continued to enjoy a reputation of quality and because they continue to this day to be made in the U.S., people perceive their quality is more trustworthy than that of tools that are manufacturered offshore for cost-cutting reasons. As a result, Shopsmith prices are able to be kept higher than comparable import tools because there is a demand. But is perception reality in this case?
I recently began rebuilding a first-year Shopsmith Inc. Mark V. The serial number is in the 2500's. Now if I understand Shopsmith tool history, Shopsmith Inc. was a startup based on the acquisition of Magna Corporation's tooling. The tooling was there, but what about the know-how? What about the materials and parts sources? What about the manufacturing process? Could Shopsmith Inc. take Magna's tooling and start building Shopsmiths as well as Magna had been? If they had no inventory control, I wonder what their quality control was like. And was the Mark V really an improvment on the 10ER or did it ultimately comprise cost-cutting design with cheaper materials and manufacturing processes?
When I took apart my early Shopsmith Inc. Mark V, I found Japanese bearings. In the early '70's, that was junk, imported to cut costs. I doubt Shopsmith Inc. obtained those bearings from Magna. Instead, they sourced cheap stuff.
My Mark V was missing a few of the bolts that hold the bench assembly to the legs. I ordered them from Shopsmith Inc. Instead of the slot-head countersunk bolts and square nuts of the original, I paid Shopsmith Inc. prices to get zinc-plated Chinese junk.
I also ordered a replacement quadrant assembly for the speed control. You know, the one that's on the 17 most frequently-ordered parts list because it's easy to get "boogered up." The new one came same as the old: die-cast pot-metal junk. Most US manufacturers producing a rack and pinion part like this today would use CNC machining, but Shopsmith Inc. apparently still does it the way everyone else has outsourced to China.
Ok, so I'm probably ranting now but I would like to believe I have a tool that was made with integrity in a shelter from the machinations of globalized financial capital, cost-cutting CEOs and unaccountable financiers. What I have seen is the same-ole same-ole. Was it always a myth?
I recently began rebuilding a first-year Shopsmith Inc. Mark V. The serial number is in the 2500's. Now if I understand Shopsmith tool history, Shopsmith Inc. was a startup based on the acquisition of Magna Corporation's tooling. The tooling was there, but what about the know-how? What about the materials and parts sources? What about the manufacturing process? Could Shopsmith Inc. take Magna's tooling and start building Shopsmiths as well as Magna had been? If they had no inventory control, I wonder what their quality control was like. And was the Mark V really an improvment on the 10ER or did it ultimately comprise cost-cutting design with cheaper materials and manufacturing processes?
When I took apart my early Shopsmith Inc. Mark V, I found Japanese bearings. In the early '70's, that was junk, imported to cut costs. I doubt Shopsmith Inc. obtained those bearings from Magna. Instead, they sourced cheap stuff.
My Mark V was missing a few of the bolts that hold the bench assembly to the legs. I ordered them from Shopsmith Inc. Instead of the slot-head countersunk bolts and square nuts of the original, I paid Shopsmith Inc. prices to get zinc-plated Chinese junk.
I also ordered a replacement quadrant assembly for the speed control. You know, the one that's on the 17 most frequently-ordered parts list because it's easy to get "boogered up." The new one came same as the old: die-cast pot-metal junk. Most US manufacturers producing a rack and pinion part like this today would use CNC machining, but Shopsmith Inc. apparently still does it the way everyone else has outsourced to China.
Ok, so I'm probably ranting now but I would like to believe I have a tool that was made with integrity in a shelter from the machinations of globalized financial capital, cost-cutting CEOs and unaccountable financiers. What I have seen is the same-ole same-ole. Was it always a myth?