Purpose of second slot on old 500 tables?

This is a forum for intermediate to advanced woodworkers. Show off your projects or share your ideas.

Moderator: admin

Post Reply
Collector
Bronze Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 3:12 am
Location: Michigan

Purpose of second slot on old 500 tables?

Post by Collector »

Hello all:

I see an old Mark 500 table, carriage, and fence for sale on Ebay, and the ad and picture show the table has a second saw slot very near the headstock side, slightly smaller than the main slot in (more or less) the middle of the table. My old 500 from 1980 has only this latter slot.

I'm wondering what is the purpose of this slot, why they eliminated it on later machines, and whether it could have any use for us today?

Someone out there must have some information on this. I'd appreciate your thoughts.

Regards,

John
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35457
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Post by JPG »

Collector wrote:Hello all:

I see an old Mark 500 table, carriage, and fence for sale on Ebay, and the ad and picture show the table has a second saw slot very near the headstock side, slightly smaller than the main slot in (more or less) the middle of the table. My old 500 from 1980 has only this latter slot.

I'm wondering what is the purpose of this slot, why they eliminated it on later machines, and whether it could have any use for us today?

Someone out there must have some information on this. I'd appreciate your thoughts.

Regards,

John
1) The older Mark 5's were 9" saws. This is important since using a 10" blade with that slot may(will) cause the blade to slice part of the table!:eek:

2) The intent was to increase the width of a bevel cut(table tilted). The location of the 'second' slot is further away from the miter gauge slot. Another 'gotchta' with its (mis)use is the miter gauge will also be sliced if you use it in the 'nearer' slot.

IMHO the all too often occurrence of these 'problems' is PROBABLY why it was discontinued.(Yes I have 'extra' cutouts in both my miter gauge and table)!;)
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
User avatar
easterngray
Platinum Member
Posts: 720
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:28 pm
Location: Cape Cod MA.

Post by easterngray »

It's also useful when ripping. With the older smaller tables, sometimes its nice to have the extra width between the blade and the rip fence without having to go to the extension table. And yes, my miter gauge bears a scar too! Alec
1960 Aniversary Model Mark 5 500 "Goldie" with most SPT's
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35457
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Post by JPG »

easterngray wrote:It's also useful when ripping. With the older smaller tables, sometimes its nice to have the extra width between the blade and the rip fence without having to go to the extension table. And yes, my miter gauge bears a scar too! Alec
YES Alec I have noticed!;)
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
Collector
Bronze Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 3:12 am
Location: Michigan

Thanks

Post by Collector »

Hello all:

I see that I've been remiss. I asked a question a month ago about the second slot on the old 500 tables, but then never thanked JPG and Eastern Gray for their kind explanations.

Thanks, guys. I do appreciate your help.

Regards,

John
Post Reply