dwevans wrote:No, what I am saying is if health insurance were mandatory that all would pay reduced costs into a larger pool, this in NOT socialism this is a basic principle of insurance.
This is the definition socialism.
so·cial·ism/ˈ]
[*]1. a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.[/LIST]Since the Affordable Helath Care act uses multiple public/private companies as providers, it is by definition NOT Socialism.
Definition ok in the strict sense.
Socialized medicine-A system controlled by a governing entity that determines what services are rendered and by whom to those who need medical attention.
Change a few details, involve profitable insurance companies and health care conglomerates as well as all other smaller players and government bureaucracies and you have something resembling OC.
Any time you remove the 'consumer' from ALL decision making and defer those decisions to something else a socialistic like system exists. I do not have a word for that, but it is a negative aspect of socialism.