NRCC Fraudulent Campaign Websites

skou · Post by **skou** » Fri Feb 07, 2014 5:15 am

dusty wrote: If you like your policy..... you can "keep" your policy. #1 lie for 2013.

AFFORDABLE Health Care.... that's a laugh in itself.

Before you fall in behind any political candidate, make sure you know what that candidate and their campaign backers really stand for. Many of the crooks are taking advantage of the candidate as well.

Who is Soros?

Who are the Coke Brothers?

Koch brothers. Funded by Karl (Marx?) Rove! (Or was it, funded the Koch bros?) Tops on my list, (to be shot!)

"[N]obody who has read a business magazine in the last few years can be unaware that these days there really are investors who not only move money in anticipation of a currency crisis, but actually do their best to trigger that crisis for fun and profit. These new actors on the scene do not yet have a standard name]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soros[/url]

Wikipedia is ALSO one of the greater Conservative lights. (Not quite true, in ANY respect.)

steve

skou · Post by **skou** » Fri Feb 07, 2014 5:21 am

joshh wrote:

I agree. Following that logic makes this even worse. That means they are taking money from those too stupid to know better. And for those who are little less stupid - "no refunds". (

I also agree. EXCEPT, people in this classification shouldn't have much disposable income. Or, we're paying the brain dead entirely too much in government assistance. (Yes, I'm joking. Almost.)

steve

JPG · Post by **JPG** » Fri Feb 07, 2014 12:46 pm

skou wrote:I also agree. EXCEPT, people in this classification shouldn't have much disposable income. Or, we're paying the brain dead entirely too much in government assistance. (Yes, I'm joking. Almost.)

steve

Way too much truth be be funny!:D:mad:

davebodner · Post by **davebodner** » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:27 pm

skou wrote:...Soros was also of Jewish derivation, but worked for the Nazis, during (and before) Big Mistake, WWII...steve

I was going to stay out of this tempest, but this quote drew me out. I remember when I first heard this charge. It's just as ridiculous now as it was then. Soros was 13, 14 years old when this happened. He "worked for the Nazis" the same way my uncle "worked for the Nazis" when he was an inmate at Buchenwald and worked in an airplane factory.

Soros' family had split up in an attempt to stay alive. He was pretending to be someone he wasn't to keep from being murdered. To portray this as some kind of error in judgement is ludicrous.

skou · Post by **skou** » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:37 pm

davebodner wrote:I was going to stay out of this tempest, but this quote drew me out. I remember when I first heard this charge. It's just as ridiculous now as it was then. Soros was 13, 14 years old when this happened. He "worked for the Nazis" the same way my uncle "worked for the Nazis" when he was an inmate at Buchenwald and worked in an airplane factory.

Soros' family had split up in an attempt to stay alive. He was pretending to be someone he wasn't to keep from being murdered. To portray this as some kind of error in judgement is ludicrous.

And, by what his later actions have shown, you believe your statement is true?

Was that the pre-sweetened drink, or did you need to add sugar?

steve

davebodner · Post by **davebodner** » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:58 pm

And, by what his later actions have shown, you believe your statement is true?

Was that the pre-sweetened drink, or did you need to add sugar?

I honestly don't know what you're saying. If you have allegation, I'll answer it.

keakap · Post by **keakap** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 1:27 pm

Ed in Tampa wrote:... it was instantly apparent to me that this was not Ann Kirkpatrick's site.

Apparent to you, but people with functioning brains are not the target. That would be the brainless, aka far left ("Obama") liberals.

keakap · Post by **keakap** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 1:32 pm

joshh wrote:... but that doesn't mean we should let people run amok preying on the stupid or careless....

Why not? We let Obama do just that.

keakap · Post by **keakap** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 1:51 pm

joshh wrote:...My business that I "advertise" on here is ...

(-follows: clear rationalizations)

" in violation of the agreement you made"

As long as those rationalizations are specifically permitted under the agreement I don't see a conflict.
I mean it's not like redefining what the meaning if "is" is, no?
{And, uh, if some rules can be broken, why not others?}

And those scammers- maybe they're just trying to level the playing field somewhat? To compensate for 94% of the mainspleen media being paid tools of the Left, and the O-regime DOJ, FBI, IRS et al being tasked to attack & destroy real Americans and reverse elections?

keakap · Post by **keakap** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 1:59 pm

skou wrote:... by Karl (Marx?) Rove! ...
steve

Love the satire!
I think it's a hoot when the Left tries to make a conservative look dirty by throwing an attribute of the Left at him.
(But I understand they have no choice. It was Lenin, I believe, that bade his comrades "call your enemy what you are".)