Saw Blade Arbors

This is a forum for intermediate to advanced woodworkers. Show off your projects or share your ideas.

Moderator: admin

User avatar
dusty
Platinum Member
Posts: 21530
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona

Re: Saw Blade Arbors

Post by dusty »

rmbishow wrote:Hmmm? I must admit to some head scratching confusion. If the SS 10" crosscut blade and the Forrest 10" crosscut blade (for example) both have 5/8" bores, why would they require different SS arbors? The SS blades require 1 1/4" (length) arbors. Why wouldn't the Forrest blade use the same SS arbor? What am I missing here?
Thanks!
Someone is confused OKAY. The Shopsmith 10" crosscut blade does not have a 5/8" bore. I don't believe Shopsmith sells a 10" saw blade with a 5/8" bore.
http://www.shopsmith.com/ownersite/cata ... ackage.htm
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
rmbishow
Silver Member
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2015 5:14 pm

Re: Saw Blade Arbors

Post by rmbishow »

Aha! I see where the confusion lies now. I was (without taking a measure) incorrectly assuming that SS arbor diameters and blade bores were 5/8" rather than 1 1/4". So then, for a Forrest blade I would need a SS #555608 5/8" Saw Blade Arbor. For a SS blade I would need a #555130 1-1/4" Saw Blade Arbor (for my SS model 510). Thanks for clearing the cobwebs and for your kind assist.
RMB
User avatar
jsburger
Platinum Member
Posts: 6585
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 4:06 pm
Location: Hooper, UT

Re: Saw Blade Arbors

Post by jsburger »

rmbishow wrote:Hmmm? I must admit to some head scratching confusion. If the SS 10" crosscut blade and the Forrest 10" crosscut blade (for example) both have 5/8" bores, why would they require different SS arbors? The SS blades require 1 1/4" (length) arbors. Why wouldn't the Forrest blade use the same SS arbor? What am I missing here?
Thanks!
They don't have the same bores. The length of the arbor has to do with the model 500 vs the 510+. The table is bigger so the arbor must be longer. The diameter is the same.

All SS blades have a 1 1/4" bore (hole). The industry standard for 10" diameter and below saw blades is a 5/8" bore (hole). SS sells an arbor for their blades (1 1/4") and they sell a 5/8" arbor for use on non SS blades.

What is your confusion? Please explain.
John & Mary Burger
Eagle's Lair Woodshop
Hooper, UT
rmbishow
Silver Member
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2015 5:14 pm

Re: Saw Blade Arbors

Post by rmbishow »

Thank you for clearing my cobwebs. I mistakenly assumed (shoulda just measured) that the SS blades had a 5/8” bore rather than a 1 ¼” bore. I understand now that SS blades require a SS #555130 1-1/4" Saw Blade Arbor while many other blades (including Forrest) require a SS #555608 5/8" Saw Blade Arbor. (I have a SS model 510.)
RMB
User avatar
dusty
Platinum Member
Posts: 21530
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona

Re: Saw Blade Arbors

Post by dusty »

For a reasonable fee Forrest will rebore blades to fit the Shopsmith (1 1/4").
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35600
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Re: Saw Blade Arbors

Post by JPG »

rmbishow wrote:Thank you for clearing my cobwebs. I mistakenly assumed (shoulda just measured) that the SS blades had a 5/8” bore rather than a 1 ¼” bore. I understand now that SS blades require a SS #555130 1-1/4" Saw Blade Arbor while many other blades (including Forrest) require a SS #555608 5/8" Saw Blade Arbor. (I have a SS model 510.)
Bingo!
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
Post Reply