![EEK! :eek:](./images/smilies/eek.gif)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/smile.gif)
.
Moderators: HopefulSSer, admin
At the risk of going political, I am going to comment and then I am "out-of-here".Ed in Tampa wrote:I just wish that our leaders would do what is right for the country instead of protecting their jobs.
I also wish that any Congress person that does not actively participate in the work they were voted for be removed and replaced. They should not allowed to be absent from any congressional vote, board meeting, committee meeting, or bill discussion.
I certainly understand that. However, if those candidates do not support what you believe in then why would you vote for them?JPG wrote:I dislike saying this, but lately my votes have gone to the candidate who did NOT bash their opponent.
I reason that that is a last ditch effort to disguise their own shortcoming.
We had a local mayor race here that did not involve all that negative crap. I actually had to make a decision.
Any candidate that 'supports' negative ads does not support my beliefs. If the other candidate does not support my beliefs either, they also do not get my vote. Yes that sometimes ends up being a wasted vote. Just because only a very small choice is available does not mean I have to vote for the lessor of the evils. Ya a catch 22!jsburger wrote:I certainly understand that. However, if those candidates do not support what you believe in then why would you vote for them?JPG wrote:I dislike saying this, but lately my votes have gone to the candidate who did NOT bash their opponent.
I reason that that is a last ditch effort to disguise their own shortcoming.
We had a local mayor race here that did not involve all that negative crap. I actually had to make a decision.
OK, got it and I agree.JPG wrote:Any candidate that 'supports' negative ads does not support my beliefs. If the other candidate does not support my beliefs either, they also do not get my vote. Yes that sometimes ends up being a wasted vote. Just because only a very small choice is available does not mean I have to vote for the lessor of the evils. Ya a catch 22!jsburger wrote:I certainly understand that. However, if those candidates do not support what you believe in then why would you vote for them?JPG wrote:I dislike saying this, but lately my votes have gone to the candidate who did NOT bash their opponent.
I reason that that is a last ditch effort to disguise their own shortcoming.
We had a local mayor race here that did not involve all that negative crap. I actually had to make a decision.