New photo sizes, since when????

Moderator: admin

User avatar
dusty
Platinum Member
Posts: 21530
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona

Post by dusty »

JPG40504 wrote:I assume underside(irrelevant) is 'plain'(no ribs etc.). Otherwise the scope of the task explodes.
It is worse than "plain". I have attempted underside detail. Remembering that the image has depth and working from both the top and the bottom requires strict adherence to that fact. If not extremley careful, one can completely ruin the flip side view without knowing it.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Post Reply