I have not voted here because I dont understand the question.
Isn't the stickies in the Maintenance and Repair section, with all the info there by members, videos from SS on rebuilding SS and the various SPTs cover what you are asking?
Recommendation for a Tech Articles Section
Moderator: admin
- "Wild Bad Bob"
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1065
- Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:03 pm
- Location: Germantown, Wi
Measure once, cut as many times as needed to get it right! Bob
56/57 Greenie with jointer, 85 Mark V with band saw, 63 Goldie with jointer, 3 ER 10s, 1951 vintage, Hernia from the Er 10s, Tool Shop SS clone 6" jointer, and 6" belt sander, Delta 10" TS, Buffalo 6" jointer, Craftsman 12" BS, 10" Ryobi planer. Compound Miter, and misc.
56/57 Greenie with jointer, 85 Mark V with band saw, 63 Goldie with jointer, 3 ER 10s, 1951 vintage, Hernia from the Er 10s, Tool Shop SS clone 6" jointer, and 6" belt sander, Delta 10" TS, Buffalo 6" jointer, Craftsman 12" BS, 10" Ryobi planer. Compound Miter, and misc.
Improve Search function
I think that Dusty has the right idea: title of post is specific to content.
500 Maintenance, 520 Maintenance, Jointing, Ripping, etc. used on the title would make the Search function work as the repository.
Having said that, I believe that us users don't want/have the discipline.
Heath's 'wiki' idea is good, but who can do it and maintain it?
Forrest
500 Maintenance, 520 Maintenance, Jointing, Ripping, etc. used on the title would make the Search function work as the repository.
Having said that, I believe that us users don't want/have the discipline.
Heath's 'wiki' idea is good, but who can do it and maintain it?
Forrest
Forrest
Huntington Beach, CA
1985 500->510->520, bandsaw, jointer, planer, PowerPro, double-tilt, 3" casters,(now obsolete) speed increaser
Huntington Beach, CA
1985 500->510->520, bandsaw, jointer, planer, PowerPro, double-tilt, 3" casters,(now obsolete) speed increaser
I voted "A waste of time" for the reasons given above in other posts. Actually it would also be a waste of space.
I believe all of any needed issue can presently be solved by using the search function or simply asking questions.
I believe all of any needed issue can presently be solved by using the search function or simply asking questions.
Octogenarian's have an earned right to be a curmudgeon.
Chuck in Lancaster, CA
Chuck in Lancaster, CA
- idcook
- Gold Member
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 4:48 pm
- Location: New York (Alley cat country), New York
forrestb wrote:I think that Dusty has the right idea: title of post is specific to content.
500 Maintenance, 520 Maintenance, Jointing, Ripping, etc. used on the title would make the Search function work as the repository.
Having said that, I believe that us users don't want/have the discipline.
Heath's 'wiki' idea is good, but who can do it and maintain it?
Forrest
I’ve noted and somewhat empathized with Dusty’s expressed concern many times. However, I agree that it simply isn’t practical to expect that level of control to ever develop in a message board forum. Even if a member wanted to discuss having problems with, say, 520 table alignment, it’s as likely as not that they’d title it “Why is This Happening to Me?”
People tend to write more or less the same way they speak.
id est — It ain’t gonna happen.
- rjent
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 2121
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 3:00 pm
- Location: Hot Springs, New Mexico
I have moderated automotive sites far larger that this by using the number of members as the size criteria, however, most of the members were kid wanna be's that made it difficult. One of my many duties was that I ran a section, as a super moderator, of that forum that was specifically tech, and it worked very well. It dealt with many many different disciplines and equipment/expertise.charlese wrote:I voted "A waste of time" for the reasons given above in other posts. Actually it would also be a waste of space.
I believe all of any needed issue can presently be solved by using the search function or simply asking questions.
However, although I voted for the inclusion of this type of sub forum, I also agree with charlese as to just asking questions here. Since this forum is so self policed, in that squabbles are handled in house by the posters (that I have seen so far), simply asking how will get you more timely and pertinent info than trying to search for the same issue.
Just one newbie's .02 ......
Dick
Dick
1965 Mark VII S/N 407684
1951 10 ER S/N ER 44570 -- Reborn 9/16/14
1950 10 ER S/N ER 33479 Reborn July 2016
1950 10 ER S/N ER 39671
1951 jigsaw X 2
1951 !0 ER #3 in rebuild
500, Jointer, Bsaw, Bsander, Planer
2014 Mark 7 W/Lift assist - 14 4" Jointer - DC3300
And a plethora of small stuff .....
"The trouble with quotes on the Internet is that you can never know if they are genuine." - Benjamin Franklin
1965 Mark VII S/N 407684
1951 10 ER S/N ER 44570 -- Reborn 9/16/14
1950 10 ER S/N ER 33479 Reborn July 2016
1950 10 ER S/N ER 39671
1951 jigsaw X 2
1951 !0 ER #3 in rebuild
500, Jointer, Bsaw, Bsander, Planer
2014 Mark 7 W/Lift assist - 14 4" Jointer - DC3300
And a plethora of small stuff .....
"The trouble with quotes on the Internet is that you can never know if they are genuine." - Benjamin Franklin
As an example of how things get put in the wrong place thisn thread should have gone here
Bruce
I didn't know what a Shopsmith was...
Three days later I owned one...
One week later I was rebuilding one...
Four months later I owned two....
Ok Ok, I'm up to four now...
I didn't know what a Shopsmith was...
Three days later I owned one...
One week later I was rebuilding one...
Four months later I owned two....
Ok Ok, I'm up to four now...