Do We Need Changes To This Forum

Moderator: admin

Should Admin Allow A Thread's Originator To Block/Delete Posts To That Thread

No but we need to make some other changes to the Forum such as...
17
31%
No but we need to make some other changes to the Forum such as...
21
38%
No but we need to make some other changes to the Forum such as...
17
31%
 
Total votes: 55

User avatar
db5
Platinum Member
Posts: 1192
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:20 pm
Location: Oklahoma City

Post by db5 »

algale wrote: Accordingly, I'd propose that Admin see if they can add a function so that the person who starts a thread can block or delete
posts to that thread.
Do I understand you correctly? You want the originator of a topic to be able to censor any views that he/she does not agree with. Is that correct or did I miss something?
User avatar
db5
Platinum Member
Posts: 1192
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:20 pm
Location: Oklahoma City

Post by db5 »

forrestb wrote:1) ADMIN needs to have a penalty box for those that violate the subject of a thread, or post inappropriate comments. And repeated violations is worthy of expulsion. Is ADMIN willing to assume that responsibility? Trying to have multiple 'volunteers' can be unwieldy and maybe bias those with a stake in the thread's issue. Come on, folks! We have a Community Forum for non-thread or non-Shopsmith or non-woodworking items.
One of the best forums I've see is Lincolnsonline.com. The Admin is a taciturn female in OKC. There are other Admins (under-sheriffs) each with technical expertise in specific areas, often overlapping. They have the authority to send email messages to someone who is off-base or trending in that direction and to throw someone into the penalty box for a week or more for violating rules repeatedly or being offensive in language or content. I think it would be of value to institute such a process here.
User avatar
algale
Platinum Member
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:13 am

Post by algale »

db5: Most of that thread hijacking and tangents that folks have complained of has got nothing to do with expressing points of view contrary to the original thread; they simply have nothing to do with the original thread. It would be like me responding to your question by asking about the best way to keep squirrels off my birdfeeders. It might be an interesting discussion worthy thread, but it is way off topic. My idea, which is far from perfect, is not to censor viewpoints you disagree with. It is a tool that allows the person who originated a thread to keep the thread on topic by deleting and blocking tangents and other thread hijacking, which is becoming an epidemic on this forum among some.
roy_okc
Platinum Member
Posts: 789
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 7:15 pm
Location: Moore, OK

Post by roy_okc »

db5 wrote:Do I understand you correctly? You want the originator of a topic to be able to censor any views that he/she does not agree with. Is that correct or did I miss something?
Yes, it could be used for censoring, but my thought is that it would be used more so to rid the thread of unwanted garbage/way off topic posts.

I don't know how much 'disagreement' type posts should exist within a woodworking tool forum's threads, especially in the non-Community areas. However, there has been a rash of 'disagreeable' posts by a small number of members that at least several other members find at annoying. If these types of posts were kept in their own Community threads, it wouldn't be so bad, but there is a problem when they are in half or more of woodworking/tool posts.
Roy

Mark V/510, Mark V/500 with parts for 510 upgrade, bandsaw, jointer, belt sander, DC3300 w/1 micron bag
Sawstop 3HP 36" PCS w/router table insert
Home designed and built CNC router, another CNC router :D desktop size
CNCed G0704 milling machine
Laser engraver
Way too much other stuff and not enough space :rolleyes:
roy_okc
Platinum Member
Posts: 789
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 7:15 pm
Location: Moore, OK

Post by roy_okc »

db5 wrote:There are other Admins (under-sheriffs) each with technical expertise in specific areas, often overlapping. They have the authority to send email messages to someone who is off-base or trending in that direction and to throw someone into the penalty box for a week or more for violating rules repeatedly or being offensive in language or content.
These 'under-sheriffs' are more commonly know as moderators.
Roy

Mark V/510, Mark V/500 with parts for 510 upgrade, bandsaw, jointer, belt sander, DC3300 w/1 micron bag
Sawstop 3HP 36" PCS w/router table insert
Home designed and built CNC router, another CNC router :D desktop size
CNCed G0704 milling machine
Laser engraver
Way too much other stuff and not enough space :rolleyes:
User avatar
algale
Platinum Member
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:13 am

Post by algale »

roy_okc wrote:Yes, it could be used for censoring, but my thought is that it would be used more so to rid the thread of unwanted garbage/way off topic posts.

I don't know how much 'disagreement' type posts should exist within a woodworking tool forum's threads, especially in the non-Community areas. However, there has been a rash of 'disagreeable' posts by a small number of members that at least several other members find at annoying. If these types of posts were kept in their own Community threads, it wouldn't be so bad, but there is a problem when they are in half or more of woodworking/tool posts.
Roy said it better than I did. Thanks.
User avatar
algale
Platinum Member
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:13 am

Post by algale »

At this moment we've got more votes suggesting the forum needs "other changes" than we have posts explaining what those "other changes" should be. If you are one of the folks who thinks "other changes" need to be made, I urge you to speak up.
User avatar
Ed in Tampa
Platinum Member
Posts: 5834
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 12:45 am
Location: North Tampa Bay area Florida

Post by Ed in Tampa »

Hey did you guys see the game on TV today? KIDDING!!!!!!

I understand the high jacked thread problem and I think we all need to be more careful about that. Hopefully with the exception of the above comments I haven't done that too often. :)

But I'm more than a little confused about people being offended. I wish when someone is offended instead of letting it fester they either PM the person or state their concern on the forum.

I have never intentionally tried to offend anyone but I probably have. Why I don't know and I can't fix the problem if I don't know.

We are all adults here and I think instead of letting things go to the point that good people want to leave they should speak up and call out the offender. If it is a misunderstanding I'm sure they will/can work it out if it is more than that then we as forum members can go to Admin and ask them to deal with the offender.

Posting on the internet is difficult for some people that depend on body language to alert others to whether they are joking, being sarcastic or down right mad. Without that body language people can get offended and the offending party has no knowledge of it.

Why can't we simply say "hey that remark was offensive", or "I could get mad if I took what you posted as you posted it." Again if someone is here to pick a fight it will quickly be evident to everyone and everyone can go to admin and say this guy is a problem.

That my two cents and that is all it is probably worth. :)
Ed in Tampa
Stay out of trouble!
User avatar
ChrisNeilan
Platinum Member
Posts: 1462
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 5:30 pm
Location: Waterford, Connecticut
Contact:

Post by ChrisNeilan »

Something needs to be done. I can't remember where, but on some forums (or maybe it was Facebook) there is a function where you can "report this post". From there a moderator can make the determination of appropriateness.
A "penalty box" is a great idea. Better than an outright suspension of account. Some people can learn through behavior modification.
I suspect that we all on occasion go at least slightly off topic, and some wiggle room should exist. I myself will keep this in mind as we go on.
Chris Neilan

Shopsmith Mark 7, Shopsmith Mark V 1982, shortened, Shopsmith 10 ER; Craftsman table saw (1964); Powermatic 3520B lathe
User avatar
joedw00
Platinum Member
Posts: 1957
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 7:01 pm
Location: Wichita, Kansas

Post by joedw00 »

The "report this post" is in the upper right corner of the post.Look for the triangle.
Joe

520, Bandsaw, Beltsander, Delta Drill Press, Delta Lathe, Craftsman Planner/Jointer, Delta Planner, Mini "Greenie" Shorty 500

Being a VETERAN is an honor
Being a GRANDPA is priceless
Post Reply