Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 1:49 pm
Thanks for confirming that.ChrisNeilan wrote:Trust me, nothing survives the cremation process. Not bacteria, not virus, not prion. After cremation, everything is inorganic. 38 years in the business!
A woodworking forum for woodworking hobbyist and woodworking projects related and unrelated to the Shopsmith MARK V
https://forum.shopsmith.com/
Thanks for confirming that.ChrisNeilan wrote:Trust me, nothing survives the cremation process. Not bacteria, not virus, not prion. After cremation, everything is inorganic. 38 years in the business!
We would only capture the ones trying to flee that haven't got it yet. Those who are sick will be turned back to fend for themselves.JPG wrote:You 'volunteering' to do the 'capturing'?:D
FWIW 'They' do not need any help plotting their objectives.
ChrisNeilan wrote:Trust me, nothing survives the cremation process. Not bacteria, not virus, not prion. After cremation, everything is inorganic. 38 years in the business!
Fear. Fear of the unknown. Fear begat by ignorance(a somewhat reasonable prudence).Ed in Tampa wrote:Tell that to the nurse that was told she was 100% protected, then tell it to the state of Louisiana. If cremation ashes are so innocuous then why is Louisiana so upset and why does Texas want to bury them in Louisiana in their bio harzadous dump?
Right now, I think there's a mix of unreasonable and uninformed fear, very reasonable and informed fear, and apathetic lack of interest. Which is resulting in bad information and ridicule being mixed in with the good valid information.Ed in Tampa wrote:Tell that to the nurse that was told she was 100% protected, then tell it to the state of Louisiana. If cremation ashes are so innocuous then why is Louisiana so upset and why does Texas want to bury them in Louisiana in their bio harzadous dump?
Imagine THAT!:rolleyes::mad:heathicus wrote:Right now, I think there's a mix of unreasonable and uninformed fear, very reasonable and informed fear, and apathetic lack of interest. Which is resulting in bad information and ridicule being mixed in with the good valid information.
From what I know, a chemical waste company in Louisiana has a contract with Texas (or whatever Texas agency/company is handling this) to dispose of their chemical waste. This company had already said they would not accept the ashes of the Ebola guy and his belongings. Then the Attorney General made the political move of announcing the State was going to block it as well.
It's not that Texas said "don't bury it here!" They were just following the contract they had with this Louisiana company. Then it became a political issue so the Attorney General could get his name in the news.
Possibly because it is inappropriate to bury ashes in a dump? They are not biohazards, they are human remains. They should be treated with a little more respect than that.Ed in Tampa wrote:Tell that to the nurse that was told she was 100% protected, then tell it to the state of Louisiana. If cremation ashes are so innocuous then why is Louisiana so upset and why does Texas want to bury them in Louisiana in their bio harzadous dump?
You stated that well.ChrisNeilan wrote:Possibly because it is inappropriate to bury ashes in a dump? They are not biohazards, they are human remains. They should be treated with a little more respect than that.
This is a terrible situation. There are allegations from the nurses union that protocols have not been followed (repeatedly and by several healthcare workers). This puts the whole country in a horrific risk.