Page 2 of 2

Re: Throwing uo dinner

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 4:20 pm
by davebodner
JPG wrote:
dusty wrote:So how did we transition from gun control and gun free zones to Planned Parenthood?

You miss Gene Howe's post?
I assume he saw it. I can't speak for Dusty, but this line comment makes it seem as if you're trying to downplay the horror of what happened in Oregon.

I thought your initial comment was spot-on. Better than mine.

Re: Throwing uo dinner

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 6:07 pm
by Ed in Tampa
If I believed gun control would prevent incidents like Oregon I would be all for it. But drugs have been illegal and nearly every city is over run with drugs. Prositution is illegal and every city has their share. Chicago has the strongest gun laws but they have a horrendous record of shootings. There is no law that can be made that will make this country gun free forever, so what is the point of talking about something that simply will not work?

Re: Throwing uo dinner

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 7:28 pm
by ERLover
To all,
and a touchy subject! For ANY law to work, guns, drugs, whores, ect,it takes 3 things to make the law work, first, enforcement; second, a conviction rate; third, a severe, for the crime, penalty. If you have just one missing/weak, you can wipe your butt with that law on that subject.

Re: Throwing uo dinner

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:07 pm
by beeg
ERLover wrote:...first, enforcement; second, a conviction rate; third, a severe, for the crime, penalty. If you have just one missing/weak, you can wipe your butt with that law on that subject.

What criminal thinks of any of that before shooting?

Re: Throwing uo dinner

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:47 pm
by ERLover
Beeg, most likely none, sorry to say. They are acting on emotion. I was more talking about the 15 year old who wants to steal your car in a bump and run, who here in WI would not get chased, ect, they know the system, and evaluate there odds.

Re: Throwing uo dinner

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:17 am
by freedomlives
John Lott discusses the rationality of crime in his book "More guns, less crime". The exception to the deterrent effect of increased number of people carrying guns for self-defense are these shootings where the killer is also often suicidal. In that case, having the pistol at hand to use to stop a killer is quite necessary. The army vet who rushed the gunman was heroic, but unsuccesful. Probably would have turned out differently if he had been armed.
A month ago on a train from France to Belgium an ISIS terrorist tried to open fire on passengers. Three US army guys on vacation saw him going to the bathroom with the AK-47 and they decided to rush him when he came out. Fortunately, the AK-47 misfired and the terrorist didn't know how to clear the jam so they were able to fight him to the ground. Had the gun not jammed, their success would have been a bit doubtful.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_Thalys_train_attack

Re: Throwing uo dinner

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2015 3:29 am
by skou
JPG wrote:
dusty wrote:So how did we transition from gun control and gun free zones to Planned Parenthood?

You miss Gene Howe's post?
"The Rosemont killer took nine lives. How many does Planned Parenthood take every day?"

How many "Black lives Matter" lives?

Look up Margaret Sanger, and see what I mean!

That woman, (sorry to ALL my female friends for lumping THIS POS
in with you!), was more rabid than Adolf! And, just as anti minority,
Especially, Blacks!

And, her organization STILL kills more Blacks than Jim Crow and the
KKK ever thought of!

"Black Lives Matter?" Someone want to PROVE it?

steve

Re: Throwing uo dinner

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2015 3:32 am
by skou
davebodner wrote:
ERLover wrote:Listening to His Highness on gun control after the shooting in Oregon, no talk about black on black shootings in Chicago, Milwaukee, Detroit, LA. ect.
My rant for the day.
No talk of white-on-white shootings, either.
Why should our "black" half WHITE President care about his
mother's race? How will THAT advance his SOCIALIST
beliefs?

steve