Moderator: admin
Hoookay!ERLover wrote:Beave, right on, there are time an executive order is needed and then get approval from congress and the senate after the fact. This has been the dumbing down of are political system, police, school standards ect.
I'll take a puppy dog sitting in the oval office over someone who commits a crime to get what they want over the american people. Sometimes its just best to remove the cancer and then then go from there. VP to Pres, and Speaker of the House to VP. Can't be worse can it?JPG wrote:Hoookay!ERLover wrote:Beave, right on, there are time an executive order is needed and then get approval from congress and the senate after the fact. This has been the dumbing down of are political system, police, school standards ect.
What are our alternatives?
I understand the bad mouthing, but do not hear any accolades for a replacement.
We are not talking about automatic weapons, yes you live in Canada, and I remember when Pres Reagen went there, and they wanted the Secret Service to surrender there Mach 10s they had/wore under there coats. Reagen said to PM Thredow, I will just back on AF1!!!!masonsailor2 wrote:I normally don't get involved with the politics here but please. You are talking about our Commander in Chief and a potential candidate for that office. These are people above the law and per them above petty criticism. Obviously several of you have a problem with disarming the populace ( not the bad guys of course ). Obviously there are no students of history here. Disarming the populace has worked so well in other nations throughout history. Ok I will give you that there have been a few exceptions but really they were minor. Communism and the Nazis can't be considered anything significant. Oh and those petulant colonists back in 1776. And another point. Why do Americans need automatic weapons ? Our federal government has them for us. That is working so well. Just ask the Arizona governor.
Paul
