TooTall wrote:My 10E has Serial # 8443;
My Logo tag says San Francisco.
Does anyone have a shopsmith that has Cleveland on the Logo?
I found this from Skip Campbell who is said to be the leading living authority on Shopsmith:
The 10E went on sale on Nov. 8, 1947 just in time for Christmas. It is possible that 4000 were sold by the end of the year but no way to know that for sure.
They sold 10Es until late 1948 and the serial numbers went into the 20000 range.
If production averaged around 20,000 per year, then chances are I have a 1947 Shopsmith or at very latest, a 1948 . . .
unless the Cleveland plant didn't start up at the same time as the San francisco plant.
Terry
I read from time to time various questions on the 10E and 10ER productions and as others have visited with Skip Campbell who is a great resource for them, and has a wealth of knowledge.
I recently was in communication with Skip regarding some of mine and he found it interesting as he put it; "You have one of the first 10E machines (1414) from late 1947 and one of the latest made (95470) from late 1953"
I have 10ER 70714 and another that is too far back in the stack to photograph at the moment. I will try to get that one and update it by the weekend.
Terry, after stating “My 10E has Serial # 8443; My Logo tag says San Francisco”, asked in the first post in the thread “Does anyone have a Shopsmith that has Cleveland on the Logo?”
I can pretty much show with certainty, not badged for a 10E or 10ER in Cleveland, based on the badges I list below for mine, but there were retrofits, upgrades and refurbishing going on as well. There are some other badges, but I have not seen one with Cleveland yet.
As you will see, all reflect San Francisco and the later two reflect only “Patent Applied For” but my oldest 1414 also says “Registered Trade Mark” on the badge below the logo. That machine is blue.
Also there is a discussion somewhere about some of the earliest units being blue.
Skip and I had a conversation about 10E 1414 being blue, which it is, and thinking it was repainted as there was some overspray blue in areas. Now that I have done more research and closer inspection of it, I believe that overspray was indeed Magna factory painted.
In support of that belief, I also have a NOS 84-2982 Magna 3 ¾” Face Plate in the box with a segment of the original tape on it, that is an identical blue color that I acquired separately from stock in another state half-way across the country.
The paint matches, and it would not have been painted as NOS if it was not the color of that series of machines made at that time.
Like all paint it has faded some with time, but they faded to the same patina in blue and were 2000 miles apart. The early 10E’s, I conclude were indeed blue. Later units were changed as we all know.

- 10E 1414.JPG (140.94 KiB) Viewed 8220 times

- 10ER 70714.JPG (124.49 KiB) Viewed 8220 times

- 10ER 95470.JPG (149.23 KiB) Viewed 8220 times

- Blue NOS Faceplate 84-2982.JPG (100.78 KiB) Viewed 8220 times

- Tailstock from 10E.jpg (109.46 KiB) Viewed 8217 times
One can note from the space they reserved for serial numbers on the 10E, they didn't expect too much further than 4 or maybe 5 digits. They corrected that in the next generation of labels for the 10ER.
Terry, I hope that helps some.
I photographed the Face Plate at my computer with a flashlight opposed to daylight as I did on the headstock. That is the difference in the two photos.
The Tailstock photo was taken by Dave H in his shop in Colorado before I got it to Texas. The Headstock photographed outdoors is that same blue as the Tailstock photographed indoors, with yet a different camera.
Everett