Page 2 of 2
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:10 pm
by mickyd
joedw00 wrote:Did anyone notice the date this was posted? 9-10-2006
, I wonder if he ever got registered, and found out what was wrong.
The first
4 posts show as 2006.
Did we go back in time? I think forum member
reible is going to have to answer since he is one of the 4 posts and the only active member name I recognize.
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:24 pm
by beeg
More than likely since the post was near the beginning of this forum. An unregistered could post, and has since been changed?
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:28 pm
by lv2wdwrk
mickyd wrote:The first
4 posts show as 2006.
Did we go back in time? I think forum member
reible is going to have to answer since he is one of the 4 posts and the only active member name I recognize.
Ed In Tampa and Bruce are both still active.
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:07 pm
by mbcabinetmaker
This reminds me of Hello is anybody there. This is what happens when you go digging up the past!:D
Mark
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:12 pm
by JPG
DUSTY: The next(and all subsequent) time you encounter a 30 MONTH old thread, Let it Be!:D I am amazed we did NOT learn anything LAST week!(Hello anybody there?):rolleyes:
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:22 pm
by dusty
JPG40504 wrote:DUSTY: The next(and all subsequent) time you encounter a 30 MONTH old thread, Let it Be!:D I am amazed we did NOT learn anything LAST week!(Hello anybody there?):rolleyes:
I'm sorry to have taxed the thought process with an old question but I think that it is probably still a valid question. There are a lot of "olde" unanswered questions on this forum, Hmmmm.
As far as what I SHOULD HAVE LEARNED last week - I don't know what you are referring to.
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 7:50 pm
by JPG
dusty wrote:I'm sorry to have taxed the thought process with an old question but I think that it is probably still a valid question. There are a lot of "olde" unanswered questions on this forum, Hmmmm.
As far as what I SHOULD HAVE LEARNED last week - I don't know what you are referring to.
Last weeks lesson: Look at the thread posting date so as to realize when it was 'started'. That with dates of the subsequent posts will indicate whether ANY response is likely to be read by the original author!;)
BTW I think the 'forum was 'new' then and unregistered 'guests' were (THEN) allowed to post is a MOST likely VALID explanation!:)
Peace be with you!
