Shopsmith Forums

Ed in Tampa wrote:I might be very wrong but I think you have the wrong Docket number.
The Docket number for Tablesaw blade contact injuries is [Docket No. CPSC-2011-0074]

The one you listed if for something about Nuclear Reg commission.

--Mea Culpa --

camerio wrote:No to derailed this post but is there a dictionary of expressions used on the internet like :

"IMHO"

and others that I see ?
I would appreciate.

For the rest, I do not think my 'Canadian' views would be appreciated or noted.
When using a tool any tool electric, or not, I do not think of anything else than what I am doing.

IMHO is an acronym for In My Humble Opinion. You can find the definition for nearly any acronym by simply putting the acronym in a search engine and pressing the search button.

On your other comment...I believe that these community pages are for expressing your views, Canadian or otherwise, and appreciated or not, everyone is entitled to their views.

JPG40504 wrote:So did you tell them so!?

....Yes...

a1gutterman wrote:....Yes...

GOOD!

Let us hope they keep extending the 'deadline' in the hopes of getting sufficient input to support regulatory action.

Let us further hope that is an unattainable goal!:)

I would prefer they just get together and take action.

When they finally come to their senses, they will realize that making flesh detection a specific requirement of all table saws sold is almost the same as creating a monopoly for this guy.

SawStop will then be left with nothing more to do except compete in the open market place based on the merits of their offering. That will be good for everyone. People who love it can go out and buy it. People who don't like it won't be forced to even consider it.

Woodworkers can learn to use their head (brain that is) as one of their most important tools and everyone will be better off.

Keep your fingers out of the red zone! Hmmmm, If I am going to keep saying that, I need to start painting my home made ZCI.