Page 3 of 3

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 7:18 am
by algale
Ed in Tampa wrote:Interestingly the report did not report on the percentage of injuries related to direct contact with the blade. Amputations which I would assume to be blade contact amounted to only 10% of the injuries. Of course there was a laceration group but it did not specify whether these were all blade contacts or not.
The link I posted was an abstract (a short summary) only and not the full article. The abstract did state, however, that the majority (by definition more than 50%) of table saw injuries were caused by contact with the blade. The amputations alone, however, amounted to more than 50,000 incidents in just seven years.

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:12 am
by brad_nalor
And its mandatory for manufacturers to label / tag in multi language all over the machines describing potential hazzards. Its like the stickers on my car sunvisor telling me it has air-bags and the dangers of that too. Good for those who need to be reminded but really now?

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 1:43 pm
by terrydowning
tdubnik wrote:I read about this real world incidentover on the Lumberjocks forum. I would guess this is about as real as you can get.
Nothing like the real world.

I am very confident in the technology of the saw stop. There are several success stories where it has prevented catastrophic injury.