520 Rip Fence
Moderator: admin
- dusty
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 21530
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
- Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona
Re: 520 Rip Fence
I think I agree with every thing you have said, John except for your conclusion.
Yes, the catalog images may not have been updated. But if you browse through your collection of catalogs (I assume you have a collection) you will find those older style 510 rails still pictured long after the 1985-1986 time frame. Okay, I'll yield on this point. The catalog pictures of those rails prove nothing.
You say your 1984 510 rails (which had the threaded studs) were replaced initially by the original 520 rails and later by 520 rails with the magnetic strip. No fuss, no drilling just remove the old and install the new rails (both 510 and 520). No compatibility issue there.
Now for the 1/4-20 threaded through holes on the front and rear edges of the tables; are those not the holes that the rail thumb screws mount in. Sure they are and did the old 510 rails not also use thumb screws (smaller thumb screws) but they were there. From this I conclude that the threaded through holes are all located in the same place and that until the 520 rails came into existence they were universal in all 510 tables.
The bosses that are located on all of the 510 and 520 tables are reference surfaces for the rails (old and new; 510 and 520). Except for some tables that don't have them at all (your report not mine). I have never seen a table without those six bosses. Take a good look at the bottom of those tables. Directly in behind the center bosses you will find castings that I contend would have prevented them from ever being used for anything other than what they are used for now. Nothing. Oh yes, the ones that are not used by the rails. Might they be reference surfaces for the milling machines???
Nobody has mentioned it but some 510 tables have holes on the sides near the front and rear corners. Others have small rectangular platforms rather than the holes. Do we know what those are? I believe I do. I believe those were for grasping the tables (mechanically) during the table milling process. I think, repeat - I think that you will find the side holes only on tables that are ribbed all the way across. On those tables that are smooth in the area between the miter tracks, you will find no holes but rectangular platforms (1996-1997).
Those tables that you have with no tapped holes and smooth tops - those are truly different. No tapped holes means to me no thumb screws. No thumb screws means 520 rails since all 505/510 rails utilized the thumb screws.
This has been fun but I still don't believe we know what differentiated pre-'86 tables from post-'86 tables.
What design change occurred during that time frame that would effect the 520 rails. Remember, John, you have a 1984 table that is compatible to all of the rail versions that we have discussed.
Yes, the catalog images may not have been updated. But if you browse through your collection of catalogs (I assume you have a collection) you will find those older style 510 rails still pictured long after the 1985-1986 time frame. Okay, I'll yield on this point. The catalog pictures of those rails prove nothing.
You say your 1984 510 rails (which had the threaded studs) were replaced initially by the original 520 rails and later by 520 rails with the magnetic strip. No fuss, no drilling just remove the old and install the new rails (both 510 and 520). No compatibility issue there.
Now for the 1/4-20 threaded through holes on the front and rear edges of the tables; are those not the holes that the rail thumb screws mount in. Sure they are and did the old 510 rails not also use thumb screws (smaller thumb screws) but they were there. From this I conclude that the threaded through holes are all located in the same place and that until the 520 rails came into existence they were universal in all 510 tables.
The bosses that are located on all of the 510 and 520 tables are reference surfaces for the rails (old and new; 510 and 520). Except for some tables that don't have them at all (your report not mine). I have never seen a table without those six bosses. Take a good look at the bottom of those tables. Directly in behind the center bosses you will find castings that I contend would have prevented them from ever being used for anything other than what they are used for now. Nothing. Oh yes, the ones that are not used by the rails. Might they be reference surfaces for the milling machines???
Nobody has mentioned it but some 510 tables have holes on the sides near the front and rear corners. Others have small rectangular platforms rather than the holes. Do we know what those are? I believe I do. I believe those were for grasping the tables (mechanically) during the table milling process. I think, repeat - I think that you will find the side holes only on tables that are ribbed all the way across. On those tables that are smooth in the area between the miter tracks, you will find no holes but rectangular platforms (1996-1997).
Those tables that you have with no tapped holes and smooth tops - those are truly different. No tapped holes means to me no thumb screws. No thumb screws means 520 rails since all 505/510 rails utilized the thumb screws.
This has been fun but I still don't believe we know what differentiated pre-'86 tables from post-'86 tables.
What design change occurred during that time frame that would effect the 520 rails. Remember, John, you have a 1984 table that is compatible to all of the rail versions that we have discussed.
Last edited by dusty on Sat Apr 30, 2016 6:49 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Re: 520 Rip Fence
Especially interesting since shopsmith says the 510 was introduced in 1985.
http://www.shopsmith.com/ownersite/toolhistory.htm
It is also interesting that the "C" headstock is listed as starting in 1991 and I have one that is a "B" built 02/13/91.
A lot of other details missing..... or dare we say wrong??
Ed
http://www.shopsmith.com/ownersite/toolhistory.htm
It is also interesting that the "C" headstock is listed as starting in 1991 and I have one that is a "B" built 02/13/91.
A lot of other details missing..... or dare we say wrong??
Ed
dusty wrote:I think I agree with every thing you have said, John except for your conclusion.
Yes, the catalog images may not have been updated. But if you browse through your collection of catalogs (I assume you have a collection) you will find those older style 510 rails still pictured long after the 1985-1986 time frame. Okay, I'll yield on this point. The catalog pictures of those rails prove nothing.
You say your 1984 510 rails (which had the threaded studs) were replaced initially by the original 520 rails and later by 520 rails with the magnetic strip. No fuss, no drilling just remove the old and install the new rails (both 510 and 520). No compatibility issue there.
{Knight of the Shopsmith} [Hero's don't wear capes, they wear dog tags]
Re: 520 Rip Fence
Oh my!!! a terrible typo. I said 1984 and I meant 1994. Very sorry to confuse the issue. Can we go back to 1994 please with the above post from me.

John & Mary Burger
Eagle's Lair Woodshop
Hooper, UT
Eagle's Lair Woodshop
Hooper, UT
- dusty
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 21530
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
- Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona
Re: 520 Rip Fence
jsburger wrote:Oh my!!! a terrible typo. I said 1984 and I meant 1994. Very sorry to confuse the issue. Can we go back to 1994 please with the above post from me.![]()
![]()
![]()
Sure, why not.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
- dusty
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 21530
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
- Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona
Re: 520 Rip Fence
Hmmm. If 510s were introduced in 1985 then there must not have been much demand for 520 Front Rail 522377. But that still leaves me wondering.
Reference part numbers 522377 and 522298 in the Shopsmith Catalog.
John has reported that his original 520 front rail (522377) was directly compatible to his 510 table as was the 520 front rail (522298).
Reference part numbers 522377 and 522298 in the Shopsmith Catalog.
John has reported that his original 520 front rail (522377) was directly compatible to his 510 table as was the 520 front rail (522298).
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
- JPG
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 35598
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
- Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)
EARLY 510 PIX MAIN TABLE
Interesting that this 510 was originally purchased and shipped in June 1986.
Shipped to Apple Valley Ca of all places.
The purpose of posting them in this thread is to illustrate the early version of the 510(at least a sample of one).
Notable is the location of the center mounting. It is centered between the outer mountings. Notice in one pix that there is no room for a kep nut at the original center mount location.
It seems the dual center bosses were introduced later.
First the 'operator' side.
Drill out for nut would remove part of reinforcing rib.
A bit crowded even without a kep nut.
Smaller jack screw with convenient holes for inserting the SS tool kit to increase torque. Quite handy for creating dimples in the connecting tubes.
Interesting that this one has the dual center bosses and larger jack screws.
I have no explanation for John's extra tapped hole other than the table was reversed. Tapped? Idonno???
Shipped to Apple Valley Ca of all places.
The purpose of posting them in this thread is to illustrate the early version of the 510(at least a sample of one).
Notable is the location of the center mounting. It is centered between the outer mountings. Notice in one pix that there is no room for a kep nut at the original center mount location.
It seems the dual center bosses were introduced later.
First the 'operator' side.
Drill out for nut would remove part of reinforcing rib.
A bit crowded even without a kep nut.
Smaller jack screw with convenient holes for inserting the SS tool kit to increase torque. Quite handy for creating dimples in the connecting tubes.
Interesting that this one has the dual center bosses and larger jack screws.
I have no explanation for John's extra tapped hole other than the table was reversed. Tapped? Idonno???
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝
Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝
Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
- dusty
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 21530
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
- Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona
Pre 1986 vs Post 1986 Mark V Tables
Thank you. You have put that question to rest. There was a casting change and that casting change moved the center mounting hole off center to the operators' right. The newly located center hole is actually 9 11/16" off the left side of the table. None of my front rails (505/510 or 520) would mount on the older table. Front rails changed as well as the main table.
Thanks goes to John and JPG for providing the input that helped to recognize the difference between the two vintages. Please ignore the fact that the pre-'86 table is not faithfully depicted here; it was not smooth between the miter tracks as shown here.
If only the front rail that I have that does not support the magnetic tape had been drilled for a pre-86 table
.
Thanks goes to John and JPG for providing the input that helped to recognize the difference between the two vintages. Please ignore the fact that the pre-'86 table is not faithfully depicted here; it was not smooth between the miter tracks as shown here.
If only the front rail that I have that does not support the magnetic tape had been drilled for a pre-86 table
- Attachments
-
- Main Table Pre&Post-1986.png (156.94 KiB) Viewed 7628 times
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Re: EARLY 510 PIX MAIN TABLE
I guess I was not clear. There are 4 tapped holes. Two in front and two in back. From your pictures they are the threaded holes for the jack screws. I forgot about that. It has been a long time since I have seen/used a 510.JPG wrote:Interesting that this 510 was originally purchased and shipped in June 1986.
Shipped to Apple Valley Ca of all places.
The purpose of posting them in this thread is to illustrate the early version of the 510(at least a sample of one).
Notable is the location of the center mounting. It is centered between the outer mountings. Notice in one pix that there is no room for a kep nut at the original center mount location.
It seems the dual center bosses were introduced later.
First the 'operator' side.
Drill out for nut would remove part of reinforcing rib.
A bit crowded even without a kep nut.
Smaller jack screw with convenient holes for inserting the SS tool kit to increase torque. Quite handy for creating dimples in the connecting tubes.
Interesting that this one has the dual center bosses and larger jack screws.
I have no explanation for John's extra tapped hole other than the table was reversed. Tapped? Idonno???
John & Mary Burger
Eagle's Lair Woodshop
Hooper, UT
Eagle's Lair Woodshop
Hooper, UT
- dusty
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 21530
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
- Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona
Re: EARLY 510 PIX MAIN TABLE
Can we conclude from your comment that the late model 520s do not have threaded through holes for jack screws?jsburger wrote:JPG wrote: I guess I was not clear. There are 4 tapped holes. Two in front and two in back. From your pictures they are the threaded holes for the jack screws. I forgot about that. It has been a long time since I have seen/used a 510.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Re: EARLY 510 PIX MAIN TABLE
I am not so sure of that since SS still sells new 510's. Do the 510 and 520 table tops have the same part number? My two newer smooth center 520 tables have the jack screw holes and only the right hand center boss. Their lineage is unknown so I have no idea if they started out as 510 tables.dusty wrote:Can we conclude from your comment that the late model 520s do not have threaded through holes for jack screws?jsburger wrote:JPG wrote: I guess I was not clear. There are 4 tapped holes. Two in front and two in back. From your pictures they are the threaded holes for the jack screws. I forgot about that. It has been a long time since I have seen/used a 510.
Here is how I see the differences...
This may be a bit hard to follow but please bare with me. Looking at JPG's early 510 table with the holes in the rails the center hole lines up with the left hand boss on tables that have two boss'. The older tables had very deep ribs on the underside and the left hand boss is in line with one of those ribs. (see JPG's pictures). Since at that time the rail fasteners required a threaded hole that was not a problem. The threaded hole did not compromise the reinforcing web under the table.
Enter the 510 rails with the fixed studs that required a through hole and more importantly clearance for washers and a nut. The rib was in the way so they moved the boss and hole to the right. Why do some tables with the new 510 rails have two center boss'? Probably just an over site when they changed the print to add the new boss. They just didn't remove the old boss.
Since the pre '86 tables did not have the moved center hole or boss the 520 upgrade kit had to have the center hole in the old position. I don't think any of us know what the differences are between pre and post 86 kits. It certainly would help if we did. A drill bit to make clearance holes from the tapped holes and instructions to make clearance for the nut for the center hole is my guess.
The first picture shows my bought new 1994 510 table. It looks just like JPG's older 510 table with the old 510 rails except it has two center boss' and the left hand boss (original) is not drilled and tapped. The second picture shows the newer smooth center table with the single right hand boss and much reduced under table webs. My other smooth center table is the same. Both have 510 rail threaded jack screw holes. Those tables are not new so your question remains unanswered.
- Attachments
-
- IMAG0412.jpg (186.31 KiB) Viewed 7579 times
-
- IMAG0413.jpg (113.83 KiB) Viewed 7579 times
John & Mary Burger
Eagle's Lair Woodshop
Hooper, UT
Eagle's Lair Woodshop
Hooper, UT