Depends if you are 'looking' up from a mark 5 (500) or down from a mark V (510).dusty wrote:I would have said, a 505 is the same as a basic 510 without the floating tables, tubes and legs.
What model do I have
Moderator: admin
-
JPG
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 35457
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
- Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝
Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝
Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
-
osx-addict
- Gold Member
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 1:56 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Hmm.. I guess I learned something today.. My '82' has a single bearing quill? I've heard others talking about moving to the newer quill.. However, by doing so what does that gain the average user? Is it more accuracy or something else? Just curious..
Nevermind.. I guess runout is the big issue that might be solved with the newer quill..
Nevermind.. I guess runout is the big issue that might be solved with the newer quill..
Rick
S/W of Los Angeles, CA
1983 Mark V model 510 (SN#140061)
S/W of Los Angeles, CA
1983 Mark V model 510 (SN#140061)
-
toolcollector
- Silver Member
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:32 pm
- Location: Auburn, California