Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 7:08 pm
There's a lot wrong with the manufacturers of dust collectors and their close liason with the magazines that rely on their advertisements.
A small home based garage/ basement shop does not need a 2HP dust collector with 6" and 4" ducts cluttering up the walls and robbing the small shop woodworker of needed wall space. This type of unit is definite overkill. Yes it will work. But why try to install a dust collector system suitable for a 1000 sq ft or larger shop into a 200 to 400 sq ft home shop.
I've been in this type of discussion on the Lumberjocks forum and can say that woodworkers are under the impression that the higher the HP, the larger the pipe - the better the flow. In many cases Just the opposite is true.
A dust collector has to do just two simple things; Have the capacity in cubic ft per minute to take away the dust and chips as fast as the tool generates them, and have a velocity in the pipe of at least 3500 ft per min in order to keep dust suspended in the tuburlent airstream. A larger shop, perhaps with more than one person working, needs a large system, but for us, using Shopsmith equipment, the DC3300 is entirely adequate.
People can't seem to understand how a 2 /1/2" hose system could possibly outperform 4" ductwork. Simple math provides the answer. In order to satisfy the 3500 ft/min velocity requirement, a 4" system must have a much larger fan and more HP in order to maintain the necessary velocity. this is because the velocity in the pipe decreases according to the square of the difference in diameter. Thus it is that many woodworkers, including some "Shopsmithers", have needlessly oversized their dust collection systems.
A 2HP system put in a home will likely require some electrical expense for a 240 volt circuit, or at least a dedicated 120 volt circuit. The noise level will be objectional. Many higher HP dust collection units are placed in separate enclosures for this reason. The electric bill will be significantly higher. This is all unnecessary for our small home shops.
I have one of the first DC3300's (1985). The only maintenance that it has required is the normal replacement of the lower plastic bags. I also have a newer DC3000 in my Upper Peninsula shop which is about 650 sq ft. There I regularily use two 8' hoses connected together as I like to keep the dust collector back in a corner. I have no problem collecting 99% of the dust and chips from my planer without having any dust accumulation in the hose.
A small home based garage/ basement shop does not need a 2HP dust collector with 6" and 4" ducts cluttering up the walls and robbing the small shop woodworker of needed wall space. This type of unit is definite overkill. Yes it will work. But why try to install a dust collector system suitable for a 1000 sq ft or larger shop into a 200 to 400 sq ft home shop.
I've been in this type of discussion on the Lumberjocks forum and can say that woodworkers are under the impression that the higher the HP, the larger the pipe - the better the flow. In many cases Just the opposite is true.
A dust collector has to do just two simple things; Have the capacity in cubic ft per minute to take away the dust and chips as fast as the tool generates them, and have a velocity in the pipe of at least 3500 ft per min in order to keep dust suspended in the tuburlent airstream. A larger shop, perhaps with more than one person working, needs a large system, but for us, using Shopsmith equipment, the DC3300 is entirely adequate.
People can't seem to understand how a 2 /1/2" hose system could possibly outperform 4" ductwork. Simple math provides the answer. In order to satisfy the 3500 ft/min velocity requirement, a 4" system must have a much larger fan and more HP in order to maintain the necessary velocity. this is because the velocity in the pipe decreases according to the square of the difference in diameter. Thus it is that many woodworkers, including some "Shopsmithers", have needlessly oversized their dust collection systems.
A 2HP system put in a home will likely require some electrical expense for a 240 volt circuit, or at least a dedicated 120 volt circuit. The noise level will be objectional. Many higher HP dust collection units are placed in separate enclosures for this reason. The electric bill will be significantly higher. This is all unnecessary for our small home shops.
I have one of the first DC3300's (1985). The only maintenance that it has required is the normal replacement of the lower plastic bags. I also have a newer DC3000 in my Upper Peninsula shop which is about 650 sq ft. There I regularily use two 8' hoses connected together as I like to keep the dust collector back in a corner. I have no problem collecting 99% of the dust and chips from my planer without having any dust accumulation in the hose.