Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:14 pm
Cool
. They turned that Mark 11 into a Mark 7!

A woodworking forum for woodworking hobbyist and woodworking projects related and unrelated to the Shopsmith MARK V
https://forum.shopsmith.com/
Nicely done. So how exactly is that attached to the underside of the shopsmith?rcf wrote:I added a storage cabinet under the way tubes of my shopsmith, to accomodate the legs of the main table, as in horizontal drilling etc, I put a hole in the back side, so the leg will drop down into it. The front clears just by a hair. The hole is plugged with an off the shelf plastic filler. (keeps the sawdust out of the drawers) So far I've had NO problems with this arrangement, been using it this way for some time now.
I'm a cautious wood-worker. I've had a tablesaw before but it died and my shop is so small that I decided to go for a shopsmith. In fact, this is the first saw I've worked on that has a saw guard on it. Nice improvement!JPG40504 wrote:Be CAREFUL!!!!!!
mikelst wrote:If you do a google book search for popular mechanics it will take you to this link:)
http://books.google.com/books?id=9tkDAAAAMBAJ
This is a historical look at the mechanics illustrated magazine and well worth a browse. I like this a site(?) a lot.
Now if you were to pull up the August 1967 issue and get to page 148 you will find an article on building a new base for the Mark 2. Or you could just use this link and go straight there.]http://books.google.com/books?id=rtMDAA ... q=&f=false[/URL]
I think this could be adapted/modified for the Mark 5 with little on even no effort. This plan builds a replacement base for the ShopSmith that approximates the same footprint while allowing the tool to tilt either way (similar to the mark 7) It has built in provisions for raising the tool for a higher work height. It could be easily modified to give you a custom work height.
Ah So! NO rack! Thanks! Should have known since it was a 10E/R M5 transition model!mikelst wrote:At this link if you look at page 184 it shows the rack for the mark 2 and the mk 5 side by side. images 20 NS 21. yes they are different.
http://books.google.com/books?id=5t0DAA ... q=&f=false
Did not realize that timing. The design Is a 10/m5 hybrid.mikelst wrote:Actually I believe that is not true. The MK 2 was introduced in 1958 as a lower cost tool to attract a new consumers who were put off by the 'high' cost of the MK 5. The MK 5 has been around since 1953.