Page 5 of 9
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 10:42 pm
by JPG
[quote="Cavediver"]Make that at least 70.
Hello all. I'm the semi-proud new owner of a beat-up '57 greenie. I've been digging for the last few hours to figure out my next step, and finally decided to register to say thanks for all of the great info!
My machine has a broken belt and a lot of stiff bearings, but everything else looks like it's in pretty good shape. It also looks like the previous owner tried to remove the main spindle the hard way, so there may be a few issues in there as well]
Welcome to the farm!
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 10:47 pm
by joedw00
Well we at least have one that is real.

Welcome to the forum Jay.
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 10:59 pm
by JPG
Let us not overlook the possibility that the recent appearance of 'Shopsmith' abrasives in Lowes stores has exposed many new folks to the 'brand' and hence to the internet sites.
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 11:15 pm
by joedw00
That would be nice if that were the case.
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 6:44 am
by dusty
joedw00 wrote:Well we at least have one that is real.

Welcome to the forum Jay.
There were 113 new member names added to the list yesterday. Of those only two(2) have posted.
What can we do to draw these newbies into our discussions. There must be something. They did not join just to read because they can do that without joining.
There are 19 new members that joined already today.
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 6:48 am
by dusty
JPG40504 wrote:Let us not overlook the possibility that the recent appearance of 'Shopsmith' abrasives in Lowes stores has exposed many new folks to the 'brand' and hence to the internet sites.
If the addition of new items into the market place has created this rapid increase in membership, that would be good. Some percentage of those are going to become customers for Shopsmith.
Shopsmith's presence on Facebook could be related but the two events do not coincide nor do they coincide with Lowe's.
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 8:09 am
by reible
So I'm up early today and start thinking about yesterday and how I was not worrying about the soaring membership here. So I took a few minutes to chart the first member (5/24/06) then stepping by 1000's to 16000 (2/28/13).
The following chart shows membership based on that information.
[ATTACH]20462[/ATTACH]
Ed
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 10:08 am
by damagi
reible wrote:So I'm up early today and start thinking about yesterday and how I was not worrying about the soaring membership here. So I took a few minutes to chart the first member (5/24/06) then stepping by 1000's to 16000 (2/28/13).
The following chart shows membership based on that information.
[ATTACH]20462[/ATTACH]
Ed
Would be nice if they were real people...but my guess is that it includes a lot more spam bots. I doubt spammers get fully deleted, just banned.
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 10:13 am
by mrhart
dusty wrote:There were 113 new member names added to the list yesterday. Of those only two(2) have posted.
What can we do to draw these newbies into our discussions. There must be something. They did not join just to read because they can do that without joining.
There are 19 new members that joined already today.
We could offer them Money! .......no, bad idea.

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 10:17 am
by dusty
I don't know if they are spammers or just lurking members or false registrations. Somehow I don't see spammer in any of the ones I have tracked.
So far this year, the membership count has increased 4611 members.
The count on January 1 was 11568
on February 1 was 13896
on March 1 was 16079
consistent with Ed's graph.