I have to agree. I'd add that it turns out Chad isn't just a forum member who happens to like and post Scott's videos; he's listed in the credits at the end of Scott's videos as one of My Growth Rings' "Chairmen of the Board." I initially assumed that was just a tongue in cheek reference to group of Scott's friends, but Scott says in some of his videos that there are in fact monthly meetings where he and the "Chairmen of the Board" sit around and talk strategy about about what's next for My Growth Rings.DLB wrote: Sun Mar 20, 2022 2:03 pm Saying 'It wasn't Scott' wasn't responsive to comments regarding the extent to which this is commercial use of the forum. Virtually every post contains information about how to help monetize MGR. Does that suggest 'yes it's wrong, but only if Scott does it himself?' Not to me.
- David
So, was Chad's strategy discussed, vetted and approved by Scott as a way to drive more forum members to his YouTube channel? If so, the claim that Scott didn't post these videos, Chad did, would be a meaningless distinction and an example of "astroturfing" -- the practice of masking who is really driving the message while making it appear to be a grassroots effort.
That's not to say that there isn't a lot of good information in Scott's free videos or that he's not entitled to monetize his YouTube channel. It's just that using someone else as a stalking horse to aggressively cross-promote a monetized YouTube channel on the forum rubs me the wrong way.
Suppose I have a friend with an ebay store that sells used Shopsmith parts who asks me to post a new link to the forum's "heads up bargain available" thread each time my friend lists a Shopsmith part for sale in his ebay store? That might be a terrific benefit to a member who is looking for a particular part who wouldn't otherwise know of or visit my friend's ebay store. But it also would seem to be not in the spirit of the forum and whatever loose and admittedly unwritten rules exist against using the forum to promote commercial sites.