Page 5 of 6
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 12:50 am
by robinson46176
JPG40504 wrote:He tried that! They looked down their noses at him and told him to never do that again! In the between time, they had thrown them out!
At least I think it was Farmer Francis!:o
Yeah, That was me.

I tried to explain it to them but they were clueless...
.
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 8:42 am
by jjwoodshop
Spelling not with a K.....
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:24 am
by robinson46176
jjwoodshop wrote:Spelling not with a K.....
Who wood do that?
.
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 10:03 am
by JPG
robinson46176 wrote:Who wood do that?
.
Only the shadow nows!;)
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 11:03 am
by Gene Howe
Knaught? Who nose?
Ever knotice how mini words in English are hetrographs? Knave/nave, to/too...etc
It's no wonder some claim English is one of the hardest languages to master.
Although, Mr Ed did OK.

He always spoke eloquently and was never hoarse.

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 3:42 pm
by JPG
Gene Howe wrote:Knaught? Who nose?
Ever knotice how mini words in English are hetrographs? Knave/nave, to/too...etc
It's no wonder some claim English is one of the hardest languages to master.
Although, Mr Ed did OK.

He always spoke eloquently and was never hoarse.

If he could have only 'overcome' that southern 'air'! Didja know his voice was from a she?
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 3:50 pm
by Gene Howe
No, didn't no that. Maybe
she was hoarse, after all.

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 3:59 pm
by JPG
Gene Howe wrote:No, didn't no that. Maybe
she was hoarse, after all.

Sure did sound hoarsey!
Next thing u now sombody wil tel us ther pet peeve is folks not staying on subject(threadwise)!:rolleyes:
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 5:11 pm
by Gene Howe
Aw, take it where you are wont to go. It was inconsequential when I started it anyway.

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 6:40 pm
by JPG
Gene Howe wrote:Aw, take it where you are wont to go. It was inconsequential when I started it anyway.

I warn't worried about 'u'!;)