Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 12:14 pm
Well, I did the research and must admit the Smart car didn't end up looking like a squashed can of tomatoes after a crash like the Isetta from the '50s. Rather, it looked like a badly dented pingpong ball. But, like most things, the devil is in the details.
Comments about the crash test conducted by the Insurance Institute were contained in an article by CNN Money dot com that you can read in its entirety here -- http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/14/autos/s ... /index.htm -- In a crash test conducted by the Insurance Institute, the Smart earned a "Good" rating but an Institute spokesman also commented that "it is simply too small to be considered safe under all conditions, including highway driving."
Also according to that article, in the NHTSA front crash test, "the [Smart] ForTwo earned the top rating of "Five Stars" for driver protection, but just "Three Stars" for passenger protection. Few vehicles today get ratings as low as three stars in NHTSA's front crash tests."
The article goes on to say, results from front impact crash tests, no matter how they are conducted, cannot be compared between cars of different sizes. In a real-world front crash, occupants in a smaller vehicle would experience greater crash forces when hitting a larger vehicle going in the opposite direction.
And, the Smart ForTwo earned the best possible ratings in side impact tests conducted by both NHTSA and IIHS, but in both cases, the door became unlatched during the crash tests. While that didn't affect the final score in either case, it's not ideal, said IIHS's Lund.
In one video of the Smart car crashing, it got a "poor" rating in a crash test with a Mercedes. The video is here -- http://www.guzer.com/videos/smart-car-crash-test.php
Here's another video, of a Smart in a crash -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ju6t-yyoU8s -- the conclusion being that the car might survive a high-speed crash, but you likely wouldn't. This is the video where the passenger door still opened after the crash. I guess that means the EMTs won't have to use the jaws-of-life to extricate the bodies.
After doing my due diligence on the Smart, I'd still not want to ride in one. At 33 MPG city, it's hardly worth the risk in my opinion.
Comments about the crash test conducted by the Insurance Institute were contained in an article by CNN Money dot com that you can read in its entirety here -- http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/14/autos/s ... /index.htm -- In a crash test conducted by the Insurance Institute, the Smart earned a "Good" rating but an Institute spokesman also commented that "it is simply too small to be considered safe under all conditions, including highway driving."
Also according to that article, in the NHTSA front crash test, "the [Smart] ForTwo earned the top rating of "Five Stars" for driver protection, but just "Three Stars" for passenger protection. Few vehicles today get ratings as low as three stars in NHTSA's front crash tests."
The article goes on to say, results from front impact crash tests, no matter how they are conducted, cannot be compared between cars of different sizes. In a real-world front crash, occupants in a smaller vehicle would experience greater crash forces when hitting a larger vehicle going in the opposite direction.
And, the Smart ForTwo earned the best possible ratings in side impact tests conducted by both NHTSA and IIHS, but in both cases, the door became unlatched during the crash tests. While that didn't affect the final score in either case, it's not ideal, said IIHS's Lund.
In one video of the Smart car crashing, it got a "poor" rating in a crash test with a Mercedes. The video is here -- http://www.guzer.com/videos/smart-car-crash-test.php
Here's another video, of a Smart in a crash -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ju6t-yyoU8s -- the conclusion being that the car might survive a high-speed crash, but you likely wouldn't. This is the video where the passenger door still opened after the crash. I guess that means the EMTs won't have to use the jaws-of-life to extricate the bodies.
After doing my due diligence on the Smart, I'd still not want to ride in one. At 33 MPG city, it's hardly worth the risk in my opinion.