Page 1 of 1
Riddle Me This
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 9:31 pm
by db5
. . .which is another way of saying Splain-a-me.
I replaced 3 Kircher low voltage lights with 4 fluorescent lights. The LV lights had 2-18 watt bulbs, 2- 18 watt bulbs and 4-18 watt bulbs. Total wattage is 72. The replacements were 4 15 watt tubes- total wattage 60.
Why is it that the output form the fluorescent tubes is SO much more than the LV bulbs?
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 10:38 pm
by JPG
Wattage is a electrical power thingey.
Lumens is a light brightness thingey.
With incandescent lamps(light bulbs) the higher wattage ones are brighter. Hence we historically have used the wattage to describe brightness(incorrectly).
Fluorescent lights have always been brighter/watt than tungsten filament lamps.
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 8:45 am
by BuckeyeDennis
JPG40504 wrote:Wattage is a electrical power thingey.
Lumens is a light brightness thingey.
With incandescent lamps(light bulbs) the higher wattage ones are brighter. Hence we historically have used the wattage to describe brightness(incorrectly).
Fluorescent lights have always been brighter/watt than tungsten filament lamps.
Ditto JPG.
Per Wikipedia, the efficiency of incandescent lights is about 14 Lumens per Watt. Compact fluorescents are about 63 Lumens/Watt. LEDs are now up to 94 Lumens/Watt, and are still improving rapidly.
So just wear your shades when you fire those babies up .. you'll look cool.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LED_lamp#C ... chnologies