claimdude wrote:I missed the sales pitch. Doesn't make our economic system any less of a ponzi scheme. His description of how our money is created is spot on though. Our money has no intrinsic value aside from the "good faith and credit of the US".... I do have a question for you though... How would you recommend he sell you gold? Our economic system is based entirely on fiat money (except Bitcoin and some precious metals) so if you are going to participate in commerce, pay your electric bill, by a snow cone, etc you have to have US dollars.
Jack
His gold selling website is prominently linked to on the YouTube page, so that's why I conclude his presentation is really part of a sales pitch and that he's got less than purely educational goals in mind with his presentation. Look up what a Ponzi scheme and pyramid scheme are (two of the terms he used repeatedly in his presentation). The Federal Reserve and fractional banking systems may be confusing and counter-intuitive to the uninitiated, but they don't share the defining characteristics of either a Ponzi scheme or a pyramid scheme. Nor, despite his assertions to the contrary, is the Federal Reserve or fiat money system illegal or unconstitutional. Claiming that they are illegal and unconsitutional ventures into politics and ideology. His use of those perjorative terms is, in my opinion, part of his sales pitch, which is partially dependent on scare tactics.
To answer your question, if I truly thought that gold was intrinsically valuable and that paper money was a hoax about to collapse, I wouldn't recommend he sell me (or anyone else) gold on a commercial basis as the danger is he'd get caught with a major position in worthless paper money when the imminent collapse finally came about. Instead, I'd recommend he sit on his gold while it appreciated in value and only cash out the absolute minimum necessary to pay taxes and purchase necessities while awaiting the zombie apocalypse.
Now I have a question for you. Where do you think gold get its value from and what makes it intrinsically superior to paper money as the basis of a monetary system? Can't eat gold, can't drink it, can't drive your car with it or even burn it to heat your house (at least paper money can be burned and has been burned at times in other countries when their currencies have collapsed!). Once you get away from straight bartering and move to a monetary system, it really doesn't matter what you choose as the basis for your monetary system. Be it gold, silver, seashells, paper or anything else, that monetized thing is only valuable because we collectively agree to pretend as if it is valuable and agree to exchange actual valuable things for whatever thing we have chosen to monetize. That is why some economists say that all money is in reality fiat money. Because even when you can trade in your paper money in for a defined quantity of gold that gold is itself without any intrinsic value unless we agree it has value.
None of this is to say that the present monetary system is perfect or immune from collapse. But potential does not equal probability and in some respects being off the Gold Standard makes it easier to prevent such collapses. Even when we had the Gold Standard, there were booms, busts, depressions, inflation, deflation, currency manipulations, deficit spending and other economic woes.
Nor is holding gold (either in far away vaults or in bullion burried in your own backyard) a panacea. As davebodner points out, people have lost a lot of money in the gold markets.