How do you really feel about the term "Smart Motor"?

Forum for Maintenance and Repair topics. Feel free to ask questions or contribute.

Moderators: HopefulSSer, admin

User avatar
chapmanruss
Platinum Member
Posts: 3489
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 8:16 pm
Location: near Portland, Oregon

How do you really feel about the term "Smart Motor"?

Post by chapmanruss »

For those wishing to comment on Shopsmith using the term 'Smart Motor" as opposed to the traditional term Headstock I started this topic. The Topic titled Smart Motor Speed Dial Ring, Back Up Spring part # 504196 seem to have been taken over by this discussion. The OP, tprowood, was simply asking a parts question but the thread has taken on a new path.

Please share your "Smart Motor" opinions here and maybe even delete them from the other thread so tprowood can get just the information he needs.

I'll start it off by saying I don't care for the use of "Smart Motor" to describe the Conventional Headstock. Maybe it's okay for the Power Pro motor but let's not confuse the two Headstocks.
Russ

Mark V completely upgraded to Mark 7
Mark V 520
All SPT's & 2 Power Stations
Model 10ER S/N R64000 first one I restored on bench w/ metal ends & retractable casters.
Has Speed Changer, 4E Jointer, Jig Saw with lamp, a complete set of original accessories & much more.
Model 10E's S/N's 1076 & 1077 oldest ones I have restored. Mark 2 S/N 85959 restored. Others to be restored.
User avatar
dusty
Platinum Member
Posts: 21371
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona

Re: How do you really feel about the term "Smart Motor"?

Post by dusty »

I too do not care for the usage of smart motor when discussing other than the PowerPro. I really see no reason for why this is being done but it really causes no harm --- just possible confusion.

Unfortunately, the persons who need to hear these thoughts are nost probably not listening to the members of this group of users.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
edma194
Platinum Member
Posts: 1906
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2020 4:08 pm

Re: How do you really feel about the term "Smart Motor"?

Post by edma194 »

I'm not thrilled with the term, but as I already said in another thread I don't see anything wrong with calling it a 'headstock'. As others have said also, 'Smart Motor' is not a real good name for a conventional headstock at all. There's nothing all that smart about it.
Ed from Rhode Island

510 PowerPro Double Tilt:Greenie PowerPro Drill Press:500 Sanding Shorty w/Belt&Strip Sanders
Super Sawsmith 2000:Scroll Saw w/Stand:Joint-Matic:Power Station:Power Stand:Bandsaw:Joiner:Jigsaw
1961 Goldie:1960 Sawsmith RAS:10ER
User avatar
BuckeyeDennis
Platinum Member
Posts: 3697
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:03 pm
Location: Central Ohio

Re: How do you really feel about the term "Smart Motor"?

Post by BuckeyeDennis »

Good idea, Russ. So moving this tidbit of mechatronics history over from the other thread:

... “Smart motor” used to be a U.S. trademark registered to Animatics Corporation, which engineered the “animatronic” electromechanical puppets that you may recall seeing at Disney World. At the time, “smart motor” referred to a motor that had the electronic motion controller and the power-drive electronics all integrated into the motor housing.

So it’s not much of a stretch to use the “smart motor” term for a PP headstock. But as for the conventional headstock, I’m not sure that even Evel Knevel could jump that terminology chasm.

I also played in the smart motor game two or three decades ago, but no one besides Animatics could use the term “smart motor” in their marketing. The generic term used by the industry was the eminently forgettable “integrated intelligent motor”, or IIM for short.

When I saw that Shopsmith had taken to using the old Animatics trademark, my first thought was to warn them of possible trademark infringement. But fortunately, I checked the USPTO website first, and learned that the trademark has been abandoned by Animatics.
DLB
Platinum Member
Posts: 2015
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2019 11:24 am
Location: Joshua Texas

Re: How do you really feel about the term "Smart Motor"?

Post by DLB »

I like the term "headstock," which is used throughout the manuals I have. And the one used by the designers and engineers before I was born and throughout my 40 years or so of using a Mark 5/V/7. Although it has a processor or two, I don't like the term for the PowerPro headstock either. I can live with it for the motor itself. But is it really that smart? When the motor is not running the 'smart portion' can look up speed chart data for you, and when the motor is running it provides some portion of the speed control. Both of those functions work pretty well, but seem pretty simple in the grand scheme of things. And it seems to me a dumb analog speed controller would be as good or better, though might not be as marketable.

- David
User avatar
twistsol
Gold Member
Posts: 225
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 9:35 pm
Location: Cottage Grove, MN
Contact:

Re: How do you really feel about the term "Smart Motor"?

Post by twistsol »

I liken it to using "Space Age Technology" which was cool in the late 60's and early 70's but was meaningless and sad much after that. There is nothing smart about the conventional headstock and tacking the term on to 70+ year old technology is just inviting ridicule.

It isn't as annoying as throwing "gate" at the end of anything and everything that some unimaginative idiot journalist thinks may be the scandal that wins them a Pulitzer.
Thanks much,

Chris Phelps
Cheap tools are too expensive
2x Mark 5 520 and a 10ER
benmcn
Gold Member
Posts: 100
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2014 6:54 pm

Re: How do you really feel about the term "Smart Motor"?

Post by benmcn »

I like the conventional headstock. I like the old nomenclature for the headstock. I like that I can repair the conventional headstock. I am just smart enough to appreciate the engineering marvel that the conventional headstock is.

The Smart Motor nomenclature doesn’t resonate with me.
User avatar
chapmanruss
Platinum Member
Posts: 3489
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 8:16 pm
Location: near Portland, Oregon

Re: How do you really feel about the term "Smart Motor"?

Post by chapmanruss »

Thanks to all of you who have added their thoughts here so far.

I would like to add to my opinion about the term "Smart Motor." Calling either the Conventional or Power Pro Headstock only "Smart Motor" tends to leave out the other functions and parts of either Headstock. The Quill, for example, is not an actual part of the motor itself but is part of the Headstock and its function. The "Smart Motor" Speed Control is two very different things between the Conventional Headstock and the Power Pro Headstock. Lastly is it really going to generate more sales jazzing up the name to "Smart Motor" for either the Mark 7 or especially the Mark V 520S or Mark 4.
Russ

Mark V completely upgraded to Mark 7
Mark V 520
All SPT's & 2 Power Stations
Model 10ER S/N R64000 first one I restored on bench w/ metal ends & retractable casters.
Has Speed Changer, 4E Jointer, Jig Saw with lamp, a complete set of original accessories & much more.
Model 10E's S/N's 1076 & 1077 oldest ones I have restored. Mark 2 S/N 85959 restored. Others to be restored.
Areba21
Silver Member
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2022 7:28 am

Re: How do you really feel about the term "Smart Motor"?

Post by Areba21 »

Totally with you on this one. "Smart Motor" just doesn't sit right when we've been calling it a headstock forever. It's like when a brand tries to rebrand something classic with a flashy new name.
edma194
Platinum Member
Posts: 1906
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2020 4:08 pm

Re: How do you really feel about the term "Smart Motor"?

Post by edma194 »

Areba21 wrote: Fri Apr 12, 2024 1:43 pm Totally with you on this one. "Smart Motor" just doesn't sit right when we've been calling it a headstock forever. It's like when a brand tries to rebrand something classic with a flashy new name.
I agree with you about "'Smart Motor' just doesn't sit right when we've been calling it a headstock forever." But we old geezers don't have to stop calling it a headstock, nobody will be confused by that. IMO where this matters is for new customers who haven't been calling it a headstock at all, and I think the name won't sit right with them either.

It's also going to be tough on anyone trying to sell a Shopsmith to explain how anything is all that smart on the conventional headstock. Pointing out that the Speed Dial has the names of the different tools on it isn't impressive. You could probably get away with that in the 50s and part of the 60s, but I don't think it will fly now-a-days.

And then the PowerPro headstock is called the same thing! What does a Shopsmith Sales Representative tell someone about this?

"Well, this one Smart Motor is really smart because you can select very specific speeds for tools including different bit sizes and types of wood, and you can program the touch pad button display, and it has a USB port that's going to have some great future uses, we think.

Now, over here we have this other Smart Motor that has a dial on it that you turn by hand. Did your grandmother have one of those old tube TVs with a dial to change channels? It works just like that."
Ed from Rhode Island

510 PowerPro Double Tilt:Greenie PowerPro Drill Press:500 Sanding Shorty w/Belt&Strip Sanders
Super Sawsmith 2000:Scroll Saw w/Stand:Joint-Matic:Power Station:Power Stand:Bandsaw:Joiner:Jigsaw
1961 Goldie:1960 Sawsmith RAS:10ER
Post Reply