Page 1 of 1

three step 10er pulleys

Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:48 am
by norwegianwoodlures
trying to find a new motor pulley for my 10 er wondering if there is any reason this one wouldnt work http://www.grainger.com/Grainger/items/3LC24?Pid=search

Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:59 am
by SDSSmith
norwegianwoodlures wrote:trying to find a new motor pulley for my 10 er wondering if there is any reason this one wouldnt work http://www.grainger.com/Grainger/items/3LC24?Pid=search
It should, it is the headstock pulley that has an odd sized bore, 13/16". The motor pulley is a standard bore and should be matched to whatever size your motor shaft is. Typically, they are either 1/2" or 5/8" in diameter.

Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 12:01 pm
by JPG
SDSSmith wrote:It should, it is the headstock pulley that has an odd sized bore, 13/16". The motor pulley is a standard bore and should be matched to whatever size your motor shaft is. Typically, they are either 1/2" or 5/8" in diameter.

I am away from 'home' in Gatlingburg, TN. this week, but I thought the pulleys were 2", 3", 4". The Grainger one has smaller sized mid and large step pulley.

Are the ss version larger(actually 3",4")?

Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 12:40 pm
by SDSSmith

Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 12:43 pm
by SDSSmith
I am never sure what folks are wanting to accomplish speed wise. The following is Grainger's 2x3x4 http://www.grainger.com/Grainger/wwg/search.shtml?searchQuery=4X559&op=search&Ntt=4X559&N=0&sst=subset

Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:04 pm
by JPG
SDSSmith wrote:I am never sure what folks are wanting to accomplish speed wise. The following is Grainger's 2x3x4 http://www.grainger.com/Grainger/wwg/search.shtml?searchQuery=4X559&op=search&Ntt=4X559&N=0&sst=subset

THAT is more what I would have expected as a replacement for a '10' motor pulley. IMHO one needs to maintain identical cone pulleys so as to NOT affect the tension when the belt is relocated.

Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:19 pm
by SDSSmith
JPG40504 wrote:THAT is more what I would have expected as a replacement for a '10' motor pulley. IMHO one needs to maintain identical cone pulleys so as to NOT affect the tension when the belt is relocated.
Again, you never know what speed(s) people are trying to achieve. I have seen these machines with 3450 rpm motors. I have toyed with setting one up as a shaper with the higher speed motor. Anyway in theory, tension should be released before moving the belt position and then retensioned after.

Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:58 pm
by JPG
SDSSmith wrote:Again, you never know what speed(s) people are trying to achieve. I have seen these machines with 3450 rpm motors. I have toyed with setting one up as a shaper with the higher speed motor. Anyway in theory, tension should be released before moving the belt position and then retensioned after.
Upon more thought(on my part) you be correct re tensioning. My 'thinking' was more towards drill presses with 5-6 steps which have 'automatic tensioning'.