dusty wrote
I am confused.
Does this mean that modern day electrical features are protecting us in a way that didn't exist before?
Is the new equipment (PowerPro) defective (non-compliant) in some way?
Is it comfortng to know that you are not the only one with this issue?
I'm confused too. But for sure, depending on one's definition of modern, more of these features are protecting us. Ground Fault(GF) protection has been around, I believe since the 70's. Arc Fault (AF) detection is much newer first effective in 2002 I've read, and only in bedrooms. The National Electric Code (NEC) changes every three years and expands the circuits requiring GF protection, AF protection, or both, in every update. Complicating that, adoption of the version of the code varies by state and locality. IIUC we currently vary from NEC 2008 to NEC 2020. So, debatable whether we actually have a National Code in my view because the minimum requirements in AZ (NEC 2008) for example and TX (NEC 2020) are different. Neither of those is an isolated case, and all five versions from 2008 to 2020 apply somewhere. AF, GF, and combined solutions can be in a breaker, receptacle, or a disconnect. That might not be a complete list.
Ground Fault is well defined IMO, with a clear definition of a threshold and tolerances around the threshold. A PowerPro sensitivity is documented, but several of us report not experiencing it. My educated guess is that it has some ground current, not enough to be above the max trip threshold. But it may trip at the minimum trip current or it may break the threshold if other devices on the circuit have a ground current. For example if the PP has a 3mA ground current, that is not enough to trip. But two devices on the circuit with the same ground current, total 6mA, would be a mandatory trip where any protection device should trip.
Arc fault is not as well defined in anything I've seen so far. Some devices arc if they are working correctly. Brushed motors for example. Lots of variation there. My understanding is the devices work on a form of arc signature analysis with a goal of distinguishing between arcs and arc faults. Depending on what you did in USAF or elsewhere you may have some experience with signature analysis, not arcs but same principle. So, another educated guess here is that this is proprietary and one brand won't work the same as another on nuisance trips. If either a conventional or PP tripped an arc fault, I would want to know why, I don't thing either should arc as a normal function. (I have two houses, with zero arc fault detectors. I'm trying to buy a new house as an investment, it will have roughly 15 arc fault detection CBs, a few of those combined with GF.)
More recently, UL entered the fray and mandated a self test function for the interrupt devices. Adding more complexity, internal circuitry, and 'software.' Probably not software as someone with a military background would use the term, probably not even firmware. Programmed hardware. This is the case I wrote about in an earlier post in which the breaker can indicate seven different reasons for tripping.
- David