PSI chuck and adapter

Create a review for a woodworking tool that you are familiar with (Shopsmith brand or Non-Shopsmith) or just post your opinion on a specific tool. Head to head comparisons welcome too.

Moderator: admin

Post Reply
User avatar
cincinnati
Platinum Member
Posts: 1172
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 6:40 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio

PSI chuck and adapter

Post by cincinnati »

Thinking of getting the PSI chuck CSC2000C http://www.amazon.com/PSI-CSC2000C-Barr ... 9N24W75752

I read with interest the post from PennView about the adapter from PSI.
http://www.shopsmith.net/forums/showthr ... =psi+chuck

Anyone else use the PSI adapter on a MarkV? Is there another adapter (Brand) that can be used on the PSI chuck?

Anyone use the PSI CSC2000C chuck on the Shopsmith?

UPDATE. Would this adapter be any better? I do not see what size the threaded send is.

http://www.woodcraft.com/Product/200519 ... nformation
"Prove to all the world Metal rules the land"
-Judas Priest, Heavy Duty.
pennview
Platinum Member
Posts: 1634
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:04 am

Post by pennview »

If you go to the Penn State website, you'll see that the body of the CSC2000C is threaded 1" x 8 TPI. That means it will fit a lathe with that thread configuration on the spindle. You can mount it on the Shopsmith, but you MUST also buy the Penn State adapter, part #L5818 (the 1" x 8 TPI Shopsmith Spindle Adapter).

The Woodcraft adapter you referenced will not fit the Penn State chuck. Rather, it is a Nova adapter that is used to mount a Nova chuck on the Shopsmith spindle. The body of the Nova chuck is threaded 1 1/2" x 8 TPI.
Art in Western Pennsylvania
User avatar
SDSSmith
Platinum Member
Posts: 1940
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:35 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Post by SDSSmith »

I had both the chuck and the adapter. I liked the chuck very much and would still have it if I didn't acquire a couple of Stronghold chucks. The set screw in the PSI adapter is so-so. But I still have that in case I want to mount something with that thread on my Mark V.

You might call PSI and see what the chuck's internal thread specs are. That may give you a couple of other options from other manufacturers. I do like how the Stonghold adapter keeps the chuck closer to the headstock.
Rob in San Diego
Email: SDSSmith51 AT gmail.com
pennview
Platinum Member
Posts: 1634
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:04 am

Post by pennview »

This is from the Penn State web site regarding the chuck in question: "Body thread 1" x 8tpi."
Art in Western Pennsylvania
User avatar
cincinnati
Platinum Member
Posts: 1172
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 6:40 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio

Post by cincinnati »

Wish Shopsmith made adapter's. Can't bet the quality of Shopsmith.
"Prove to all the world Metal rules the land"
-Judas Priest, Heavy Duty.
User avatar
terrydowning
Platinum Member
Posts: 1678
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:26 pm
Location: Windsor, CO

Post by terrydowning »

I have the Penn State Adapter, the Barracuda 2 chuck and the Penn State Collet chuck system. The adapter works for Scroll Chuck and the collett chuck I haven't had any issues in 2 months of use, Bowls up to 6" so far. I don't want to go nay larger until I find a speed reducer. The collet chuck is very nice and much more accurate for drilling provided your stock is round. I recommend these items.
--
Terry
Copy and paste the URLs into your browser if you want to see the photos.

1955 Shopsmith Mark 5 S/N 296860 Workshop and Tools
https://1drv.ms/i/s!AmpX5k8IhN7ahFCo9VvTDsCpoV_g

Public Photos of Projects
http://sdrv.ms/MaXNLX
User avatar
reible
Platinum Member
Posts: 11283
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:08 pm
Location: Aurora, IL

Post by reible »

This is a post from back in 2008 of a portion of thread where I explained the issue I had with PSI and there adapter.

http://www.shopsmith.net/forums/showpos ... stcount=12

I have since seen one on ebay selling for about $40 + S/H that could be an upgraded version???

I still have mine sitting a bottom drawer wait to be modified or tossed, I was to say the least unhappy with that purchase.

Ed
Post Reply