Today in the shop (powerpro routing)

This is a forum for intermediate to advanced woodworkers. Show off your projects or share your ideas.

Moderator: admin

User avatar
ryanbp01
Platinum Member
Posts: 1506
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:43 pm
Location: Monroeville, IN

Post by ryanbp01 »

At the risk of sounding stupid, what is the difference between under table routing and using the overarm pin router? The reason I ask this is to become better informed about doing a possible Power-Pro conversion.

BPR
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35457
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Post by JPG »

ryanbp01 wrote:At the risk of sounding stupid, what is the difference between under table routing and using the overarm pin router? The reason I ask this is to become better informed about doing a possible Power-Pro conversion.

BPR
Location of router/motor/bit.

Location of pin.
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
User avatar
SDSSmith
Platinum Member
Posts: 1940
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:35 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Post by SDSSmith »

ryanbp01 wrote:At the risk of sounding stupid, what is the difference between under table routing and using the overarm pin router? The reason I ask this is to become better informed about doing a possible Power-Pro conversion.

BPR
I would say one major difference is the reference surface. For under table routing the reference surface is the same as the surface being routed. Just the opposite in over arm or above table routing.
Rob in San Diego
Email: SDSSmith51 AT gmail.com
User avatar
fjimp
Platinum Member
Posts: 2345
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:45 pm
Location: Lakewood, Colorado

Post by fjimp »

For me it is preference. As I age I find I am more comfortable being able to track cutting blades. Below table limits my view. Jim
F. Jim Parks
Lakewood, Colorado:)

When the love of power is replaced by the power of love the world will have a chance for survival.
User avatar
heathicus
Platinum Member
Posts: 2648
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 1:02 am
Location: WhoDat Nation

Post by heathicus »

Reible, I learn something every time I read your posts. Thanks for sharing your knowledge!
Heath
Central Louisiana
-10ER - SN 13927, Born 1949, Acquired October 2008, Restored November, 2008
-10ER - SN 35630, Born 1950, Acquired April 2009, Restored May 2009, A34 Jigsaw
-Mark V - SN 212052, Born 1986, Acquired Sept 2009, Restored March 2010, Bandsaw
-10ER - SN 39722, Born 1950, Acquired March 2011, awaiting restoration
User avatar
reible
Platinum Member
Posts: 11283
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:08 pm
Location: Aurora, IL

Post by reible »

JPG40504 wrote:If front rear 'adjustment' is needed, a counterbored slot(and cap screw) with flat bottoms would work better than a tapered counter sink. May have to grind down the head to minimize height.

Lack of material thickness(insert) may make it impractical.
I wanted to use the same screws as all table inserts.

In fact my guess about how close the flipped table would align was with in about a 1/4" so my choice to make the slots this dimension was flawed.

The alignment is really two parts, the in and out or carriage adjustment is never going to be an issue. The left/right location has no adjustment except for the bolts that hold the table on. But it makes no sense to change your alignment just to use an insert. The slots on the table insert sounded like the way to go and had I done a better job of it would have been fine.

The process I used to locate the hole was to fit the insert in the table and then use a 1/16" drill bit to drill a through hole. I started by drawing a center line on the insert and using that for the starting of the process. I was set up in the motor below router position shown here when I drilled the hole.

[ATTACH]19255[/ATTACH]

I then rotated the table to the router above (drill press) position. When I compared he hole position with the location of the bit it was actually about lined up with the edge of the hole. This could have been more like 1/32" difference, far closer then I ever expected.

[ATTACH]19256[/ATTACH]

By this time the slots had been done so there was no going back. I loosened the screws and move the insert to align with the bit and tighten in place to start the drilling process. A slightly over-sized hole would have worked in this case so long as it would hold the insert in place.

Ed
Attachments
DSCF3755sc.jpg
DSCF3755sc.jpg (72.96 KiB) Viewed 3116 times
DSCF3763sc.jpg
DSCF3763sc.jpg (36.33 KiB) Viewed 3115 times
User avatar
reible
Platinum Member
Posts: 11283
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:08 pm
Location: Aurora, IL

Post by reible »

SDSSmith wrote:As always Ed, well thought out and well executed. Thank you for sharing. I am curious about the larger template guides, who makes them and where did you get them?
Sadly the place I was able to get the template guide in 1/16" steps will be going away soon. They have some brass left on clearance until the first of the year when they close up operations.

http://www.oak-park.com

A second source is lee valley but they do not have as many sizes as oak-park use to. The template guide in 1/16" steps can be use to do a pass at one size larger then finished size then switch for a finial finished cut. Since you use only 1/2 the template dia. that equates to doing a 1/32" final pass.... sweet.

The oak-park set was/is not cheap, they use to list for I believe $12.95 ea, about $3 less when I last looked.

Ed
User avatar
reible
Platinum Member
Posts: 11283
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:08 pm
Location: Aurora, IL

Post by reible »

ryanbp01 wrote:At the risk of sounding stupid, what is the difference between under table routing and using the overarm pin router? The reason I ask this is to become better informed about doing a possible Power-Pro conversion.

BPR
It looks like you have your answer in previous posts but I want to cover one more thing for you so you can make an informed choice if and when required.

The shopsmith can be used as a overhead or as a below the table router. It is not a pin router. Yes it has some of the aspects but lack an extremely important detail, that is the ability to lock the depth with the handle. On an OPR the lever that allows for the vertical movement also twists, the twist lock and unlocks the depth. The shopsmith would require you to have a third arm to do the locking... I'm guessing you don't have a third arm.

If you want the pin router option you will want to direct funds for that, other funds for the shopsmith dual tilt and powerpro for a below the table router function.

Ed
User avatar
dusty
Platinum Member
Posts: 21481
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona

Post by dusty »

reible wrote:I wanted to use the same screws as all table inserts.

In fact my guess about how close the flipped table would align was with in about a 1/4" so my choice to make the slots this dimension was flawed.

The alignment is really two parts, the in and out or carriage adjustment is never going to be an issue. The left/right location has no adjustment except for the bolts that hold the table on. But it makes no sense to change your alignment just to use an insert. The slots on the table insert sounded like the way to go and had I done a better job of it would have been fine.

The process I used to locate the hole was to fit the insert in the table and then use a 1/16" drill bit to drill a through hole. I started by drawing a center line on the insert and using that for the starting of the process. I was set up in the motor below router position shown here when I drilled the hole.

[ATTACH]19255[/ATTACH]

I then rotated the table to the router above (drill press) position. When I compared he hole position with the location of the bit it was actually about lined up with the edge of the hole. This could have been more like 1/32" difference, far closer then I ever expected.

[ATTACH]19256[/ATTACH]

By this time the slots had been done so there was no going back. I loosened the screws and move the insert to align with the bit and tighten in place to start the drilling process. A slightly over-sized hole would have worked in this case so long as it would hold the insert in place.

Ed

This is very interesting and I think impressive. It leads me to conclude that the main drive line is located precisely on the centerline between the main table uprights. One could also conclude that there is no slop in your drill chuck. There also can be no slop in the carriage when locked in position.

Like I said, I am impressed.

Just wondering, Ed. Did you enlarge the mounting holes in your trunnions. My guess is that you did not. For those of us that did, achieving this degree of alignment would be a bit more difficult.

HOWEVER, it seems like you could loosen the trunnions bolts and reposition the table such that it would align perfectly in both configurations.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
User avatar
algale
Platinum Member
Posts: 4828
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:13 am

Post by algale »

reible wrote: When I went to setup I knew the tie bar guard would have to come off, same if you want to use the drum sander from below. That is just 2 fasteners and only takes seconds but it has to be done.
Ed,

Thanks for the tutorial. It makes perfect sense the tie bar guard has to come off for this under table operation but is that spelled out in the instructions for the double tilt upgrade? (Any Mark 7 owners care to comment on whether it is part of the Mark 7 instructions?)

My other question is whether you will be reinstalling the tie bar guard for normal operations (say table saw)? And, if not, can you let us know whether you notice any degradation in dust collection efficiency without the tie bar guard. I find I am constantly catching the tie bar guard on the lower blade guard when setting up for sawing operations and I would love to do away with it in its entirety if it doesn't degrade dust collection performance significantly.

Al
Gale's Law: The bigger the woodworking project, the less the mistakes show in any photo taken far enough away to show the entire project!

Post Reply