Using sanding disk with table saw insert

Create a review for a woodworking tool that you are familiar with (Shopsmith brand or Non-Shopsmith) or just post your opinion on a specific tool. Head to head comparisons welcome too.

Moderator: admin

bobgroh
Gold Member
Posts: 400
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 1:12 pm
Location: Just east of Kansas City, Missouri

Using sanding disk with table saw insert

Post by bobgroh »

Just saw SS's latest special and they mention using a special table saw insert with the sanding disk to help capture the saw dust. Neat idea and that immediately got me thinking about building my own insert with wood or the like (always wanted some more for sawing with a zero kerf setup). Anyhow I have several questions for the group:

Q1: How well does this work out regarding saw dust capture?

Q2: Why does SS comment that you need the steel sanding disks to use their table saw insert??
Bob Groh
Blue Springs, Missouri (just east of Kansas City, MO)

--------------------------------------------
1984 SS Mark V updated to model 510
1994 SS Mark V updated to model 520
SS SPT's: Bandsaw
Other tools:routers, Bosch router table, Craftsman 6" jointer, Steel City 12" bench planer, Porter Cable 7" power saw, and too much other stuff (not really - just kidding!!)
stew
Gold Member
Posts: 149
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:01 am
Location: Downers Grove, IL

Post by stew »

You need to use the steel disks because they are flat on both sides, where the aluminum ones have ribbing on the back of the disks that would interfear with the insert.
bobgroh
Gold Member
Posts: 400
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 1:12 pm
Location: Just east of Kansas City, Missouri

Post by bobgroh »

Ah, ha!! Thanks.
Bob Groh
Blue Springs, Missouri (just east of Kansas City, MO)

--------------------------------------------
1984 SS Mark V updated to model 510
1994 SS Mark V updated to model 520
SS SPT's: Bandsaw
Other tools:routers, Bosch router table, Craftsman 6" jointer, Steel City 12" bench planer, Porter Cable 7" power saw, and too much other stuff (not really - just kidding!!)
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35598
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Post by JPG »

They also have a longer 'hub'.
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
User avatar
SDSSmith
Platinum Member
Posts: 1940
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:35 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Post by SDSSmith »

JPG40504 wrote:They also have a longer 'hub'.
Not all steel discs are created equally. In the early years the steel disc used a shorter hub. The later years used the longer hub to be compatible with the 510/520 lower guard. My 1986 500 came with a longer hub on the steel sanding disc. A 'complete' 500 to 510/520 conversion kit will include a longer hub to 'upgrade' a disc or a sanding disc with the longer hub.
Rob in San Diego
Email: SDSSmith51 AT gmail.com
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35598
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Post by JPG »

SDSSmith wrote:Not all steel discs are created equally. In the early years the steel disc used a shorter hub. The later years used the longer hub to be compatible with the 510/520 lower guard. My 1986 500 came with a longer hub on the steel sanding disc. A 'complete' 500 to 510/520 conversion kit will include a longer hub to 'upgrade' a disc or a sanding disc with the longer hub.

Ya 500 and 500+ versions. Only the 500+ is relevant though.

I wasn't 'explicit' enough! Sorry!
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
rmb24
Silver Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 2:16 pm
Location: Upstate New York's Finger Lakes Region

Post by rmb24 »

Doesn't the standard 510/520 saw-blade table insert work just as well for disk sanding as the special disk-sanding insert?

I realize that the small tabs near the center of the saw insert will prevent getting the disk as close to the edge of the slot. For those using the saw insert for sanding, is that a significant concern?
Bob in Upstate New York's Finger Lakes Region
User avatar
SDSSmith
Platinum Member
Posts: 1940
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:35 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Post by SDSSmith »

rmb24 wrote:Doesn't the standard 510/520 saw-blade table insert work just as well for disk sanding as the special disk-sanding insert?

I realize that the small tabs near the center of the saw insert will prevent getting the disk as close to the edge of the slot. For those using the saw insert for sanding, is that a significant concern?
The length of the slots in the 510/520 saw and sander inserts are the same. The disc sander insert is a little wider and does lack the tabs you referenced. I would suspect that you would not be able to lower the table (exposing more disc) as far with the 510/520 saw insert.

However, using the saw insert in conjunction with the lower guard would seem to provide better dust collection over that realized when sanding at the edge of the table with just the lower guard.
Rob in San Diego
Email: SDSSmith51 AT gmail.com
User avatar
SDSSmith
Platinum Member
Posts: 1940
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:35 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Post by SDSSmith »

rmb24 wrote:Doesn't the standard 510/520 saw-blade table insert work just as well for disk sanding as the special disk-sanding insert?

I realize that the small tabs near the center of the saw insert will prevent getting the disk as close to the edge of the slot. For those using the saw insert for sanding, is that a significant concern?
The length of the slots in the 510/520 saw and sander inserts are the same. The disc sander insert slot is a little wider and does lack the tabs you referenced. I would suspect that you would not be able to lower the table (exposing more disc) as far with the 510/520 saw insert.

However, using the saw insert in conjunction with the lower guard would seem to provide better dust collection over that realized when sanding at the edge of the table with just the lower guard.
Rob in San Diego
Email: SDSSmith51 AT gmail.com
rmb24
Silver Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 2:16 pm
Location: Upstate New York's Finger Lakes Region

Post by rmb24 »

I just checked (on my 510, upgraded to 520) to see if the table could be lowered further, say with the sanding disk table insert installed and with the quill fully extended, to expose more sanding surface, compared with the standard saw insert in place.

I found that the table cannot be lowered any further and it's not blocked by the insert.

The upshot is that I don't see the advantage of the sanding insert over the saw insert for disk sanding through the table slot (except possibly for those small tabs near the center of the saw insert keeping the sanding disk a little further from the edge of the slot).

I don't own a sanding disk insert, but if anyone here has reasons that I haven't thought of why I should, please post your ideas here.

Bob
Bob in Upstate New York's Finger Lakes Region
Post Reply