Going back to the original premise of the original post, I am curious whether you have any examples in mind of wood working publications looking in a disparaging way at Shopsmith.WmZiggy wrote:Why do wood working publications, and in my experience it's a majority of them, look in a disparging way at SS as a serious woodworking machine? I've had this question for a number of years and thought I would put it before us here. I subscribe to three major publications from high end to DIY and in all cases you never see or read a tool review or building project that includes SS, except those publications owned and operated by SS. Why the discrimination against this great American (and one of the last still built in the USA) tool maker? I've got my own thoughts but would like to see what others think.
I haven't seen any article about Shopsmith in any wood working magazine in years and the ones from the past I've seen and read aren't what I'd call disparaging. Now, as for the decision in recent years to ignore Shopsmith amounting to discrimination, that I suspect, as others have pointed out, is largely a function of advertizing dollars and the failure to send free samples of equipment to the magazines for testing. It is no coincidence that when Shopsmith ceased advertizing in the magazines that the magazines stopped talking about Shopsmith.

