Whew! but I think I get it. Maybe I should see if there is also a set screw on the output shaft pulley (I did not look for one before and I presume this is the pulley on the drive shaft?) and if so I could move it in a smidge to assure the belts are in balance now I have moved the motor pulley? Too late for me to do it now, but I might give a look in the AM if this seems a good idea...JPG40504 wrote:This is one of those things not intuitively obvious'. It becomes apparent through much observation and gaining understanding of what happens as the drive belt(motor) is pulled down into the variator.
Two(three?) things happen. The obvious one is the motor belt rides between the sheaves at a reduced radius. The 'other' thing that happens is the variator shifts in/out along it's shaft to accommodate the belts moving up/down in the sheaves in opposing direction. As the 'inner' side of the motor belt lowers into the variator, in addition to causing the sliding center sheave to move 'outward', it causes the variator to slide inward. The motor belt tries to maintain a centered position between the sheaves. Inward/inner and outward are relative to the location within the power station. Inward is towards the motor, outwards is toward the end where the tink tink tink was occurring.
Now the belt going to the output shaft is changing as a result of the variator being raised(the motor belt is being pulled down into the variator by raising the shaft it is turning on), the output shaft belt is being 'loosened' by the reducing spacing between the variator shaft and the output shaft. Also the center sheave sliding outward puts pressure against the inner side of the output shaft belt. End result then is the output shaft belt rides at a greater radius than before.
The inverse occurs when the motor belt is slackened by lowering the variator shaft.
Now for the 'speed up caused by moving the motor pulley, and why it made the tink tink tink go away. When the motor pulley is moved 'in' on the motor shaft,(or moving the motor 'in') the motor belt continues to seek a centered position between the variator sheaves. Doing so causes the variator to shift inward, thus increasing the clearance to the frame(tink tink tink elimination). That inward shift causes a slight decrease of the belt radius since the belt is also being pulled further into the variator which causes the center sheave to move outward and the output shaft belt rides at a slightly greater radius. Pant Pant Pant!
This 'understanding' came with much pain(thinking too hard) and consternation as I ran into the same issue when I first got my power station 'used'. As I came to discover, it was assembled from parts that were acquired by an e-bay seller and assembled for sale. There were 'extra' parts and mis-assembled parts and I had little faith that the motor mount was as it should be(long screws and multiple nuts and washers). I have since come to realize that Rube Goldberg motor mount was OEM! Anyway, way too many hours was spent observing the effects of moving stuff relative to other stuff. I also spent some time thinking of a way to use an 'extra' variator(another e-bay purchase from Skip Campbell) as a speed 'alterer' on a mark 5. That is an ongoing thingey. Having that variator 'in hand' added greatly to my understanding of what what happens inside the power station.
FWIW, moving the output shaft pulley will also cause shifting the variator sliding positions. The thing to be avoided, is both belts trying to center themselves and preventing each other from being successful.(another elusive thing to understand:(). When all is well, both belts do not experience side forces when equilibrium is attained.
Sorry to be so verbose, but I have 'learned' that ss info is not always 'complete'.
Power station sheave adjustments?
Moderator: admin
-
reluctant43
- Gold Member
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:52 pm
- Location: Northborough, MA
- JPG
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 35600
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
- Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)
There is one there. I would not bother it unless it asks for attention.reluctant43 wrote:Whew! but I think I get it. Maybe I should see if there is also a set screw on the output shaft pulley (I did not look for one before and I presume this is the pulley on the drive shaft?) and if so I could move it in a smidge to assure the belts are in balance now I have moved the motor pulley? Too late for me to do it now, but I might give a look in the AM if this seems a good idea...
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝
Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝
Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
-
reluctant43
- Gold Member
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:52 pm
- Location: Northborough, MA
- dusty
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 21530
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
- Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona
Do we all agree that the motor pulley and the spindle pulley are both firmly attached (by keys and set screws) to their respective shafts?
Do we also agree that they neither change position on their shafts nor change width?
The variator is different. It is not physically attached to the shaft. It is free to move in and out on the shaft in response to whatever physical forces might be applied to it. Its position on the shaft, however, can be altered somewhat by changing the position of the motor pulley on the motor shaft. The tink, tink, tink noise should be eliminated by moving the motor pulley in ever so slightly on the motor shaft.
It would be my recommendation that the pulleys be positioned for satisfactory operation (no tink, tink) while operating at Low Speed. If I remember correctly, I moved the pulleys (motor and spindle) out as far as I could without creating the tink, tink.
Do we still further agree that the Power Station is most noisy when operating at high speed?
Are we all aware that the power station motor requires occasional lubrication? These bearings are not sealed. They need to be oiled.
By the manual (unless I have missed something) there is no other preventive/periodic maintenance to be performed.
So why is the Power Station so @#$%*& noisy?
Do we also agree that they neither change position on their shafts nor change width?
The variator is different. It is not physically attached to the shaft. It is free to move in and out on the shaft in response to whatever physical forces might be applied to it. Its position on the shaft, however, can be altered somewhat by changing the position of the motor pulley on the motor shaft. The tink, tink, tink noise should be eliminated by moving the motor pulley in ever so slightly on the motor shaft.
It would be my recommendation that the pulleys be positioned for satisfactory operation (no tink, tink) while operating at Low Speed. If I remember correctly, I moved the pulleys (motor and spindle) out as far as I could without creating the tink, tink.
Do we still further agree that the Power Station is most noisy when operating at high speed?
Are we all aware that the power station motor requires occasional lubrication? These bearings are not sealed. They need to be oiled.
By the manual (unless I have missed something) there is no other preventive/periodic maintenance to be performed.
So why is the Power Station so @#$%*& noisy?
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
- JPG
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 35600
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
- Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)
dusty wrote:Do we all agree that the motor pulley and the spindle pulley are both firmly attached (by keys and set screws) to their respective shafts?
Do we also agree that they neither change position on their shafts nor change width?
Do we still further agree that the Power Station is most noisy when operating at high speed?
Are we all aware that the power station motor requires occasional lubrication? These bearings are not sealed. They need to be oiled.
By the manual (unless I have missed something) there is no other preventive/periodic maintenance to be performed.
So why is the Power Station so @#$%*& noisy?
The belts are 'stiff'.
The belts take a set(or never get rid of oem set).
The set causes varying belt tension.
That varying tensions on the two belts most of the time are not synchronous and create varying beat frequency sounds.
The tension(from the belts) on the variator is greatest at high speed.
The slide the variator shaft is attached to has a very sloppy fit.
That slop allows the slide and shaft and variator to wave back and forth creating a rattling noise in the process(as well as causing the variator center sheave to oscillate on the shaft.
The motor is mounted to a thin sheet metal deck(efficient mechanical motion to sound convertor).
May be more but that is off the top of me noggin!
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝
Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝
Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
- dusty
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 21530
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
- Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona
I assume you have experienced this and have, to some extent, reduced the noise level. If so, details would be appreciated.JPG40504 wrote:The belts are 'stiff'.
The belts take a set(or never get rid of oem set).
The set causes varying belt tension.
That varying tensions on the two belts most of the time are not synchronous and create varying beat frequency sounds.
The tension(from the belts) on the variator is greatest at high speed.
The slide the variator shaft is attached to has a very sloppy fit.
That slop allows the slide and shaft and variator to wave back and forth creating a rattling noise in the process(as well as causing the variator center sheave to oscillate on the shaft.
The motor is mounted to a thin sheet metal deck(efficient mechanical motion to sound convertor).
May be more but that is off the top of me noggin!
I have eliminated the theory that the sheet metal vibrating is the cause of the noise I experience. I did so by introducing (temporarily) thicker materials into the mount. I gained nothing by doing so.
The variator slide I tried to shim even though I see no sloppy movement in that shaft except when changing speed.
Both of my Power Stations are as noisy as ever.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
- JPG
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 35600
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
- Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)
I went so far as to get new slide parts with negligible improvement. I futzed with the parts and also tried shimming, also to little tangible improvement. I can quiet the top down a little by applying manual pressure but have not tried anything more stout.dusty wrote:I assume you have experienced this and have, to some extent, reduced the noise level. If so, details would be appreciated.
I have eliminated the theory that the sheet metal vibrating is the cause of the noise I experience. I did so by introducing (temporarily) thicker materials into the mount. I gained nothing by doing so.
The variator slide I tried to shim even though I see no sloppy movement in that shaft except when changing speed.
Both of my Power Stations are as noisy as ever.
I do think the sheet metal top needs 'reinforcing' JMHO. IIRC it was done on this forum by one member. Maybe some day when all the WIP gets DONE.
I have come down off the serene mountain top and decided to put up with the noise!;)
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝
Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝
Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
- BuckeyeDennis
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 3814
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:03 pm
- Location: Central Ohio
I agree with most of that. But on mine, at least, the variator slide gets clamped down nice and tight when you lock down the speed adjustment lever. It sounds like Dusty's does too.JPG40504 wrote:The belts are 'stiff'.
The belts take a set(or never get rid of oem set).
The set causes varying belt tension.
That varying tensions on the two belts most of the time are not synchronous and create varying beat frequency sounds.
The tension(from the belts) on the variator is greatest at high speed.
The slide the variator shaft is attached to has a very sloppy fit.
That slop allows the slide and shaft and variator to wave back and forth creating a rattling noise in the process(as well as causing the variator center sheave to oscillate on the shaft.
The motor is mounted to a thin sheet metal deck(efficient mechanical motion to sound convertor).
May be more but that is off the top of me noggin!
The thin sheet metal deck is the root cause of the problem. Not so much because it is a good sound transducer, but rather because it is an inadequate structural member between the motor and the variator housing.
When the belt tension varies, for the exact reasons you mention, the sheet metal flexes, allowing the motor and the variator housing to move just a bit. This turns the cyclic belt-tension fluctuations into mechanical vibration. The vibration, in turn, shakes everything on the Power Station. And at that point, if it can make noise, it will. Especially when the vibration hits a resonant frequency.
Now imagine that the variator housing and the motor were both bolted securely to a granite block. No matter how much cyclic belt tension variation you get, neither the motor nor the variator housing is going to move. The belt tension becomes an internal stress only, plain and simple. No movement, no vibration. No vibration, no buzzing or rattling.
Here's a link to a post showing the stiffeners that I installed in mine .. it's near the bottom of the first post. https://forum.shopsmith.com/viewtopic.php?t=12217 That Power Station was mighty noisy without the stiffeners, and now it purrs like a kitten.
- JPG
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 35600
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
- Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)
BuckeyeDennis wrote:I agree with most of that. But on mine, at least, the variator slide gets clamped down nice and tight when you lock down the speed adjustment lever. It sounds like Dusty's does too.
The thin sheet metal deck is the root cause of the problem. Not so much because it is a good sound transducer, but rather because it is an inadequate structural member between the motor and the variator housing.
When the belt tension varies, for the exact reasons you mention, the sheet metal flexes, allowing the motor and the variator housing to move just a bit. This turns the cyclic belt-tension fluctuations into mechanical vibration. The vibration, in turn, shakes everything on the Power Station. And at that point, if it can make noise, it will. Especially when the vibration hits a resonant frequency.
Now imagine that the variator housing and the motor were both bolted securely to a granite block. No matter how much cyclic belt tension variation you get, neither the motor nor the variator housing is going to move. The belt tension becomes an internal stress only, plain and simple. No movement, no vibration. No vibration, no buzzing or rattling.
Here's a link to a post showing the stiffeners that I installed in mine .. it's near the bottom of the first post. https://forum.shopsmith.com/viewtopic.php?t=12217 That Power Station was mighty noisy without the stiffeners, and now it purrs like a kitten.
Aha!!! You da one!!!!!:)
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝
Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝
Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
- BuckeyeDennis
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 3814
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:03 pm
- Location: Central Ohio
Nope. You, Dusty, Reible, and all the other "Platinum Members" are da ones! I greatly enjoy absorbing all the ShopSmith and general woodworking knowledge that I can from all of you, and hopefully will be able to add something from my own narrow field of expertise on rare occasion.JPG40504 wrote:Aha!!! You da one!!!!!:)
And also hopefully, not be too annoying with my frequent late-night ramblings!