Power Issues

Forum for Maintenance and Repair topics. Feel free to ask questions or contribute.

Moderator: admin

User avatar
woodhead52
Gold Member
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 2:10 pm
Location: Virginia Beach, VA

Post by woodhead52 »

dusty wrote:This is a great thread with a great outcome. Problem Solved.

You current run condition (with the two neutral wires tied together) is my standard switch configuration. In fact, this is a configuration that Shopsmith recommended back in the days of Sawdust Sessions.

That switch (with the wires as part os the switch) is representative of the older switches. I strongly recommend that you lay in a spare.
Hello Dusty, Ain't a happy ending great.

As you suggest, I am ordering a new switch.
I wonder why they ever bothered to use a switch to join the neutral wires instead of just crimping them together. There's probably a logical explanation, beyond what I can see, like wire control or something. At least having a double pole switch allowed for a fall back solution. Possibly just what SS thinking was well.
Woodhead
Just a chip off the ol' block!

1993 SS Mark V 510 with a 520 Upgrade, 520 Extension Fence (2) Extension Tables, (4) Floating Tables (4) connecting tubes (2) SS Band Saw, SS Jointer, SS Belt Sander, SS Power Station, SS DC3300
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35600
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Post by JPG »

woodhead52 wrote:Hello Dusty, Ain't a happy ending great.

As you suggest, I am ordering a new switch.
I wonder why they ever bothered to use a switch to join the neutral wires instead of just crimping them together. There's probably a logical explanation, beyond what I can see, like wire control or something. At least having a double pole switch allowed for a fall back solution. Possibly just what SS thinking was well.
The switch was a 'convenient' way to terminate both the line cord and the motor leads as well as being overkill re switching neutral..
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
User avatar
woodhead52
Gold Member
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 2:10 pm
Location: Virginia Beach, VA

Post by woodhead52 »

JPG40504 wrote:The switch was a 'convenient' way to terminate both the line cord and the motor leads as well as being overkill re switching neutral..
What ever the reason it kept me in business. Not that I am doing anything more than cleaning it up, aligning, and inventorying what I've got and still need, etc. I a little ways to go before I get to project mode. I'm thinking the best way to get my feet under me is to start working my way through the Home Study Guide.

Be on the lookout for a new thread with some pictures of stuff I need help identifying, mostly lathe parts, I think, of which I'm the least knowledgeable.

I did make a little sawdust today just checking that the table saw and band saw are working well. They seem to be. :)
Woodhead
Just a chip off the ol' block!

1993 SS Mark V 510 with a 520 Upgrade, 520 Extension Fence (2) Extension Tables, (4) Floating Tables (4) connecting tubes (2) SS Band Saw, SS Jointer, SS Belt Sander, SS Power Station, SS DC3300
User avatar
BuckeyeDennis
Platinum Member
Posts: 3814
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:03 pm
Location: Central Ohio

Post by BuckeyeDennis »

woodhead52 wrote:Hello Dusty, Ain't a happy ending great.

As you suggest, I am ordering a new switch.
I wonder why they ever bothered to use a switch to join the neutral wires instead of just crimping them together. There's probably a logical explanation, beyond what I can see, like wire control or something. At least having a double pole switch allowed for a fall back solution. Possibly just what SS thinking was well.
I can offer an educated guess on this. But first, a little background on switch operation is needed.

When switch contacts first "break" open, the load current does not stop immediately. Initially, the contact gap is tiny, and the source voltage causes the current to simply arc across the contacts. This arc ionizes the air, and so there is a local path across the contact gap where the air is much more conductive than normal. In AC applications, the switch will generally continue to arc even when the switch is fully open, until the AC source voltage passes through zero. Then the conductivity of the air gap returns to normal, and the source voltage is blocked beginning with the next half-cycle.

The very same switch will generally have two different voltage ratings. One for AC applications, and another for DC applications. The DC rating is much lower, because the size of the contact gap must extinguish the arc all by itself.

Assuming an AC application, the switch will have at least two different current ratings, depending on whether the load is resistive or inductive. The current rating is highest for a resistive load, because there is no stored energy in the load that must be removed.

An induction motor like in a (non-PowerPro) Shopsmith is, logically enough, quite inductive. So when you try to stop the current through the motor windings, it resists with all it's might, generating however much voltage is necessary in order to keep the current flowing, until the inductive energy is exhausted.

Now guess where all that inductive energy gets dissipated. Yep, right in the switch contacts. That's why switches are rated for lower current with an inductive load. Contacts do "wear out" over time from normal use, due to erosion of the contact material from the arcing. A good datasheet will have a curve showing expected contact life (in cycles) vs. load current for different loads.

So now, finally, here is my guess for why SS connected both contacts in series. It spreads the inductive energy over two contacts instead of one, reducing the heat generation and contact erosion on each contact, and thereby extending the life of the switch.

Sorry for the long-winded reply, but you did ask. ;)
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35600
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Post by JPG »

[quote="BuckeyeDennis"]

. . . ALL GOOD . . .




So now, finally, here is my guess for why SS connected both contacts in series. It spreads the inductive energy over two contacts instead of one, reducing the heat generation and contact erosion on each contact, and thereby extending the life of the switch.

Sorry for the long-winded reply, but you did ask. ]
Hmmmm! I doubt that was even 'considered'. Already stated my 'guess'!:D

P.S. I agree they are 'in series' as far as arcing goes. That statement may create 'discussion'!
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
User avatar
dusty
Platinum Member
Posts: 21530
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona

Post by dusty »

JPG40504 wrote:Hmmmm! I doubt that was even 'considered'. Already stated my 'guess'!:D

P.S. I agree they are 'in series' as far as arcing goes. That statement may create 'discussion'!
Well, whatever Shopsmith's original theory was - it seems that during the later years they might have changed their minds. There is a Sawdust Session in which they recommend connecting the neutrals together and when you purchase a new switch from them they provide jumpers and instructions on how to do so.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35600
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Post by JPG »

dusty wrote:Well, whatever Shopsmith's original theory was - it seems that during the later years they might have changed their minds. There is a Sawdust Session in which they recommend connecting the neutrals together and when you purchase a new switch from them they provide jumpers and instructions on how to do so.
I think that 'transpired' when they went from switches with tab terminals(dpst) that were replaced with the pigtail version(spst).
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
Post Reply