Oh, Lord help me, I've just gotta bite on this topic.
Here's my philosophy: The best tool for a job is the one that gives acceptable results with the least time and effort, while providing a pleasant user experience. Aka "The right tool for the right job."
Here's my theory: Analog instruments tend to reduce the time required to get get a process under control, because they give you immediate proportional feedback as to how much correction is required. Unlike a digital go/no-go gauge. The point is not greater precision, it is better feedback. Dial indicators are nice analog feedback devices.
This weekend, I finally got around to a doing a full alignment and sharpening of my Pro Planer. I started by re-watching the Nick Engler video on setting the knives using a dial indicator. Then when doing the initial indicator setup myself, it struck me that the method would give you a really nice cone-shaped cutter if the cutterhead were not parallel to the table in the first place. I do believe that Nick aluded to this in the video, but it didn't quite sink in until I did the setup myself.
So I checked my cutterhead alignment, and found that it was off by 0.005" end to end, and the tiebars were worse. It being seriously frigid outside, this was a good day to stay indoors and make it right. So I futzed around most of Saturday afternoon figuring out the chain & sprocket alignment thing. At the end of the afternoon, the table was aligned to the cutterhead and to all tiebars to within +/- 0.002", all points. If I had to do it again, it would take maybe 30 minutes.
On Sunday, I got back to knife sharpening and alignment (and have several paper-cut-class lacerations to prove it

). Sharpening was easy, using the SS jig. As for alignment, the first blade took maybe 20 minutes using the Nick method, to within +/- 0.001". Second knife took under 10 minutes for the same results. Third knife took about three minutes.
So developing a good repeatable process can take a significant investment of time. But once you have the process nailed down, a good instrument can enable it to go very quickly and accurately indeed. With little or no trial and error. Proof of the pudding: my test cuts resulted in boards flat to 0.001", right out of the gate.
Now mind you, I find innate satisfaction in perfecting a process. But if you find a different approach to be more gratifying, then I heartily endorse it ... for you.
