Fence alignment question

Forum for people who are new to woodworking. Feel free to ask questions or contribute.

Moderator: admin

zooman65
Silver Member
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2014 1:52 pm

Fence alignment question

Post by zooman65 »

I have heard numerous people say when aligning the fence to make the outfeed side slightly off about 1/16 from the infeed side. I cannot remember which direction if it is less or more, but my questions is can anyone explain why I would offset the fence rather than keep it perpendicular to the blade?
wasatch
Gold Member
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:13 pm
Location: USA

Post by wasatch »

The offset would make the fence further from the blade as the wood exits, after being cut. Adjusted the other way would pinch the wood against the blade causing wedging, burning and possible kickback.
User avatar
dusty
Platinum Member
Posts: 21530
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona

Post by dusty »

I have heard the same thing but I DO NOT do that. I attempt to make the fence perfectly parallel to the blade. I do however, make certain that the fence is not closer on the outfeed side of the blade than it is on the infeed side.

As previously stated, that creates a pincher action which can result in a kick back.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35598
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Post by JPG »

+++++++++++++++ What Dusty said!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
User avatar
edflorence
Platinum Member
Posts: 689
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 8:14 pm
Location: Idaho Panhandle

Post by edflorence »

Amen to comments already posted... Only thing I could add is that if you have a 500 like I do be sure the splitter is in line with the blade and not angled. If angled toward the fence it can have the same effect as having the fence not aligned correctly and can make the space between the blade and the fence narrower at the outfeed side of the blade which can lead to the negative consequences as mentioned.
Ed
Idaho Panhandle
Mark 5 of various vintages, Mini with reversing motor, bs, dc3300, jointer, increaser, decreaser
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35598
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Post by JPG »

edflorence wrote:Amen to comments already posted... Only thing I could add is that if you have a 500 like I do be sure the splitter is in line with the blade and not angled. If angled toward the fence it can have the same effect as having the fence not aligned correctly and can make the space between the blade and the fence narrower at the outfeed side of the blade which can lead to the negative consequences as mentioned.
I would think a splitter closer to the fence than the blade would help prevent the workpiece getting caught between the fence and the blade, however, it would tend to bind the workpiece between the splitter and the fence.

Again dead on is the goal!
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
charlese
Platinum Member
Posts: 7501
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 10:46 pm
Location: Lancaster, CA

Post by charlese »

What Dusty said and JPG in his post just above concerning the splitter.
A sixteenth of an inch off is way too far. If it is dead on this is best, but if it is off by a small amount best to have the back slightly away from the blade.
Octogenarian's have an earned right to be a curmudgeon.
Chuck in Lancaster, CA
User avatar
algale
Platinum Member
Posts: 4841
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:13 am

Post by algale »

If you do this make sure you ALWAYS use your fence on only one side of the blade. What is an offset away from the blade becomes a offset toward the blade when you move the fence from one side of the blade to the other.
User avatar
forrestb
Platinum Member
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:22 pm
Location: Huntington Beach CA

exactly

Post by forrestb »

Use of the fence on both sides of the blade mandates the fence be DEAD ON parallel to the blade. I think we all would forget to realign the fence when we moved to the other side.
Forrest
Forrest
Huntington Beach, CA
1985 500->510->520, bandsaw, jointer, planer, PowerPro, double-tilt, 3" casters,(now obsolete) speed increaser
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35598
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Post by JPG »

zooman65 wrote:I have heard numerous people say when aligning the fence to make the outfeed side slightly off about 1/16 from the infeed side. I cannot remember which direction if it is less or more, but my questions is can anyone explain why I would offset the fence rather than keep it perpendicular to the blade?
Parallel to the sides of the blade is the ;)goal!
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
Post Reply