dusty wrote:It is a cheap one from China but accuracy is not the issue. That is to say if it reads 3600 when it should read 3650 would not cause my issue.
When looking at the shaft speed when set to low speed I want to read 700rpm.
One machine reads 758 and the other 749. Not bad.
At J Speed, one reads 2026 and the other reads 1889.
And 1900 seems to be the intended speed(from various charts etc.).
If so, one is about 7% fast, and the other about 1% slow.
This whole system is
not linear.
You have one pulley causing the belt to position on the idler pulley and a second responding to the difference in belt tension in a compensating manner.
Thus as the control sheave is positioned from slow, the belt takes a new position on the pulley. What that position is, is determined by not only the control sheave position, but the belt width, the slope of the pulley sheaves, the belt length, the spring tension on the floating sheave, the motor pulley sheave slope, the phase of the moon, the temperature(both ambient and belt), and the humidity, and the time of day, and the gps coordinates, and lord only knows what else.
And you wondered why there are no rpm graduations on the dial.
Yes the Mark VII guys just plain goofed(or did not understand the foolishness of the number, nor the reason for the letters).
Realize the intent is to set to an acceptable speed range, not a specific speed.