Upgraded Dust Collector Hood

Create a review for a woodworking tool that you are familiar with (Shopsmith brand or Non-Shopsmith) or just post your opinion on a specific tool. Head to head comparisons welcome too.

Moderator: admin

User avatar
dusty
Platinum Member
Posts: 21530
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona

Post by dusty »

beeg wrote:Just remember that the build up helps the filtering process.




I get a buildup in about that area. The dust settles there and builds up.
Comments about removing that caking dust always confuses me. I read, frequently, that the caked dust improves the filtering capability. If that be the case, why remove it unless it is so thick that it obstructs the air flow all together?

Any time I change the dust collector bag it seems like a lot of the caking breaks off - usually right after I remove the bag.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
User avatar
forrestb
Platinum Member
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:22 pm
Location: Huntington Beach CA

someone help me on DC

Post by forrestb »

I, too, have read that the collected dust helps with filtration but cannot imagine how that can be.

If a dust particle closes off a 'hole' in the filter that means the next dust particle has to find another 'hole' to plug. The previously filled 'hole' is not allowing airflow to bring the new particle to it. Repeat this millions (billions?) of time and you are just clogging the filter which reduces airflow and, I think, the efficiency.

If 'clogging' a filter is help in filtering, why do we replace the 'clogged' filters?

Help!

Forrest
Forrest
Huntington Beach, CA
1985 500->510->520, bandsaw, jointer, planer, PowerPro, double-tilt, 3" casters,(now obsolete) speed increaser
User avatar
terrydowning
Platinum Member
Posts: 1678
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:26 pm
Location: Windsor, CO

Post by terrydowning »

dusty wrote:When does the 1 micron capability of the 42" filter really become a valuable characteristic for the DC3300.

Undoubtedly, if you work in a small enclosed shop or in a basement shop, filtering of that fine dust is good if not necessary.

I have often debated getting the larger filter but have not done so. I have the 24" filter (5 micron) and I work in a shop that is open to the great out of doors via a double garage door. I have rationalized that I don't really need the larger filter (1 micron) because of that.

Is my thinking flawed?
It depends on which DC experts you talk to. Most will go on and on about OSHA standards, air flow ratings and MERV filtration standards. There is nothing wrong with that per se' but do keep in find that OSHA standards are concerned with long term exposure in an "Occupational" setting meaning a typical work exposure to the hazard(s) is at least 35 hrs per week. I just don't have the time for 35 hrs of shop time per week. I too work in an open environment. I currently have no breathing issues such as asthma and no known allergies. My biggest issue with DC is not letting it get tracked into the house or settle on cars once parked back in the garage. I use a shop vac and some fans to blow the fines out and keep the air moving. To further avoid dust issues I make sure that severe dust operations like power sanding are performed as close to the large opening of the shop as possible. I'm also changing my work habits and reducing power tool usage. This is a hobby for me it is supposed to be an enjoyable time sink so I don't care if projects take longer using hand tools than they wood using power tools.

Just my 2 cents on the issue. Do what you are comfortable with.
--
Terry
Copy and paste the URLs into your browser if you want to see the photos.

1955 Shopsmith Mark 5 S/N 296860 Workshop and Tools
https://1drv.ms/i/s!AmpX5k8IhN7ahFCo9VvTDsCpoV_g

Public Photos of Projects
http://sdrv.ms/MaXNLX
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35598
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Post by JPG »

As usual there be trade offs here.

The three DC 3300 filters are made from felt. IIRC the larger ones are less 'porous' and thus provide finer and finer particle capture as the size increases. That allows for more or less the same cfm.

As for the 'improved' filtering obtained by allowing caking, I can only surmise that the cake is still porous and provides greater surface area for capturing finer new particles. That has to be at a reduced cfm. That reduction will be less with the larger filters.(as will the amount of caking[thickness])

So the larger filters can be 'finer' and still maintain the cfm.



In other words, caking will provide smaller particle filtration, but at the expense of cfm. The larger the filter, the less this reduction will be and the time between 'time to decake' will be greater.


Lotta conjecture, but that is the way I see it.;)
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
charlese
Platinum Member
Posts: 7501
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 10:46 pm
Location: Lancaster, CA

Post by charlese »

beeg wrote:Just remember that the build up helps the filtering process.

I get a buildup in about that area. The dust settles there and builds up.
My guess is; Your hood is oriented so the zipper is located on the left side of the DC. This places the zipper above the fan discharge flange. This outlet is very close to the side of the DC, and a likely area for dust to catch and build up.

I rotated the hood so the zipper is at the back.

I absolutely agree with Forrest that cake is more of a restriction than a filter. A cake isn't needed or desirable in a larger hood.
Octogenarian's have an earned right to be a curmudgeon.
Chuck in Lancaster, CA
User avatar
beeg
Platinum Member
Posts: 4790
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: St. Louis,Mo.

Post by beeg »

[quote="charlese"]My guess is]

VERY GOOD Chuck. that's EXACTLY where it is right near the on/off switch. When I get home this weekend I'll be rotating the filter. THANKS AGAIN for the tip.
SS 500(09/1980), DC3300, jointer, bandsaw, belt sander, Strip Sander, drum sanders,molder, dado, biscuit joiner, universal lathe tool rest, Oneway talon chuck, router bits & chucks and a De Walt 735 planer,a #5,#6, block planes. ALL in a 100 square foot shop.
.
.

Bob
User avatar
"Wild Bad Bob"
Platinum Member
Posts: 1065
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:03 pm
Location: Germantown, Wi

Post by "Wild Bad Bob" »

Not to mention the electrical charge of the dust particle and the "magnetic" attraction of it, since the majority of dust particles have a positive charge.
Measure once, cut as many times as needed to get it right! Bob
56/57 Greenie with jointer, 85 Mark V with band saw, 63 Goldie with jointer, 3 ER 10s, 1951 vintage, Hernia from the Er 10s, Tool Shop SS clone 6" jointer, and 6" belt sander, Delta 10" TS, Buffalo 6" jointer, Craftsman 12" BS, 10" Ryobi planer. Compound Miter, and misc.
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35598
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Post by JPG »

rbursek wrote:Not to mention the electrical charge of the dust particle and the "magnetic" attraction of it, since the majority of dust particles have a positive charge.

'Positive' relative to what?
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
Post Reply