Why Will This Not Work?
Moderator: admin
- dusty
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 21481
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
- Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona
Why Will This Not Work?
for verifying table flatness?
If I zero the dial gauge on a known flat surface and then move it around systematically on the Main Table top, will the observed variations be an accurate representation of the tables' flatness?
[ATTACH]25925[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH]25926[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH]25927[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH]25928[/ATTACH]
If not...why not?
I would have given this table a clean bill of health except for the fact that this is the table that caused my concerns with the Shorty when set up as a drill press. This lingering issue has been expressed in a different thread and is yet to be resolved.
If I zero the dial gauge on a known flat surface and then move it around systematically on the Main Table top, will the observed variations be an accurate representation of the tables' flatness?
[ATTACH]25925[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH]25926[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH]25927[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH]25928[/ATTACH]
If not...why not?
I would have given this table a clean bill of health except for the fact that this is the table that caused my concerns with the Shorty when set up as a drill press. This lingering issue has been expressed in a different thread and is yet to be resolved.
- Attachments
-
- Checking Table Flatness 010 (Custom).jpg (166.36 KiB) Viewed 6866 times
-
- Checking Table Flatness 011 (Custom).jpg (173.13 KiB) Viewed 6866 times
-
- Checking Table Flatness 013 (Custom).jpg (151.69 KiB) Viewed 6872 times
-
- Checking Table Flatness 014 (Custom).jpg (141.73 KiB) Viewed 6867 times
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
- dusty
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 21481
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
- Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona
Thank you for the reply. Yes, I know that I can do this with a lot of extras that I don't have. Extras like a surface plate and calibrated pyramids. I'm trying to get a reasonably accurate verification of flatness without an investment.
Maybe you are telling me that that can not be done. If so, I appreciate that also.
Maybe you are telling me that that can not be done. If so, I appreciate that also.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
I found my framing square and a feeler gauge was all that I needed to check out the flatness of any Shopsmith table or joiner. Close counts for my woodworking needs. I did switch to using the Total Shop steel main tables when I was going to do any metal working with the Shopsmith. I still have 2 more of these very heavy Total Shop steel main tables laying in my shop that I never got around to using.
Bill Mayo bill.mayo@verizon.net
Shopsmith owner since 73. Sell, repair and rebuild Shopsmith, Total Shop & Wood Master headstocks, SPTs, attachments, accessories and parts. US Navy 1955-1975 (FTCS/E-8)
Shopsmith owner since 73. Sell, repair and rebuild Shopsmith, Total Shop & Wood Master headstocks, SPTs, attachments, accessories and parts. US Navy 1955-1975 (FTCS/E-8)
- JPG
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 35430
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
- Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)
The block and dial indicator makes a good 'hole' detector.
The surface being 'measured' is an unreliable reference surface.
I agree a good known straight edge is adequate. Backlight to detect, feeler gauge to measure.
It might be interesting to observe the area 'above' the mounting screw bosses as the mounting screws are tightened(one at a time).
The surface being 'measured' is an unreliable reference surface.
I agree a good known straight edge is adequate. Backlight to detect, feeler gauge to measure.
It might be interesting to observe the area 'above' the mounting screw bosses as the mounting screws are tightened(one at a time).
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝
Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝
Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
- dusty
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 21481
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
- Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona
Let me start here by saying that I do not have a major problem with any of my tables. What I have is a bunch of seemingly contradictory information that has me confused and challenged.
The dial indicator, moved systematically all over the table top shows no significant variations. All points equal to the same point are equal to one another. Yes?
The straight edge and flash light and feeler gauge are good. At least I think that is what has been said.
Well, I used those. Moving Starrett 36" Straight Edge to all of the horizontal and vertical lines in the attached drawing and measuring the gap reveals no gap greater than .005".
BUT, if I relocate the straight edge to the diagonals and make those same measurements (with a feeler gauge), I have gaps in some locations as great as .012"-.014".
How can all points be planar in the horizontal and vertical while at the same time indicate low spots along the diagonal.
[ATTACH]25929[/ATTACH]
The dial indicator, moved systematically all over the table top shows no significant variations. All points equal to the same point are equal to one another. Yes?
The straight edge and flash light and feeler gauge are good. At least I think that is what has been said.
Well, I used those. Moving Starrett 36" Straight Edge to all of the horizontal and vertical lines in the attached drawing and measuring the gap reveals no gap greater than .005".
BUT, if I relocate the straight edge to the diagonals and make those same measurements (with a feeler gauge), I have gaps in some locations as great as .012"-.014".
How can all points be planar in the horizontal and vertical while at the same time indicate low spots along the diagonal.
[ATTACH]25929[/ATTACH]
- Attachments
-
- Main Table Flatness Check Points (Custom).png (57.3 KiB) Viewed 6845 times
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
- BuckeyeDennis
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 3800
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:03 pm
- Location: Central Ohio
I believe that a simple torsional twist (of the entire table) could do that. In which case the center would be high when measuring across one of the diagonals, and low when measuring across the other diagonal.dusty wrote:Let me start here by saying that I do not have a major problem with any of my tables. What I have is a bunch of seemingly contradictory information that has me confused and challenged.
The dial indicator, moved systematically all over the table top shows no significant variations. All points equal to the same point are equal to one another. Yes?
The straight edge and flash light and feeler gauge are good. At least I think that is what has been said.
Well, I used those. Moving Starrett 36" Straight Edge to all of the horizontal and vertical lines in the attached drawing and measuring the gap reveals no gap greater than .005".
BUT, if I relocate the straight edge to the diagonals and make those same measurements (with a feeler gauge), I have gaps in some locations as great as .012"-.014".
How can all points be planar in the horizontal and vertical while at the same time indicate low spots along the diagonal.
[ATTACH]25929[/ATTACH]