Stabilizing Your Mark V

Forum for people who are new to woodworking. Feel free to ask questions or contribute.

Moderator: admin

User avatar
dusty
Platinum Member
Posts: 21530
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona

Stabilizing Your Mark V

Post by dusty »

In the most recent "Tip" Nick suggests that the stability of the Shopsmith main table can be improved by attaching it, using extension tubes, to one of the Extension Tables.

Now I whole heartedly agree with that assessment. I do not intend to be challenging that at all.

But, if one is good, would two be better? Is it adviseable to purchase a second Extension Table (and 5' Extension Tubes if you don't already have them) to still further increase table stability?:confused:

If you believe that the 2nd extension table would be a valuable asset, is your opinion based on improved "accuracy" or "repeatability"?:confused:
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
rcoder
Gold Member
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 3:44 pm

Stabilizing

Post by rcoder »

Dusty,

Me thinks that might be over kill. I have been using the technique shown in the video for years. Moving the table at that point would result in moving the whose machine. Also with something like the sander or band saw on the other end would mean their removal.

Since I am not always a very good planner I often forget an operation that requires going back to the band saw or belt sander. You technique would require more removal and replacement.

Bob
Willcox, AZ
rcoder
Gold Member
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 3:44 pm

Stabilizing

Post by rcoder »

Dusty,

Me thinks that might be over kill. I have been using the technique shown in the video for years. Moving the table at that point would result in moving the whole machine. Also with something like the sander or band saw on the other end would mean their removal.

Since I am not always a very good planner I often forget an operation that requires going back to the band saw or belt sander. You technique would require more removal and replacement.

Bob
Willcox, AZ
charlese
Platinum Member
Posts: 7501
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 10:46 pm
Location: Lancaster, CA

Post by charlese »

dusty wrote:.....If you believe that the 2nd extension table would be a valuable asset, is your opinion based on improved "accuracy" or "repeatability"?:confused:
What about if I don't agree? I side in with Bob on this one! It amounts to overkill for all the reasons Bob states, plus - - Do you really think it is worth the cost of an additional extension table to achieve the amount of improved accuracy it MAY produce? I thought I recently read about a guy that thought paying $3 and change for a taper screw was outlandish.

I'd be paying out $170 (extension table) for a doubtful added .001"? stability - Not for me!

But keep on thinking, Dusty! The previous idea with the extension table was a dandy! :D They all can't be winners. It took T.Edison many, many tries to get his first working vacuum light bulb. It took a team of engineers 40 tries to get to WD-40. :rolleyes:
Octogenarian's have an earned right to be a curmudgeon.
Chuck in Lancaster, CA
User avatar
dusty
Platinum Member
Posts: 21530
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona

Stabilizing Your Mark V

Post by dusty »

Charlese: These were QUESTIONS not assessments.

But, if one is good, would two be better? Is it adviseable to purchase a second Extension Table (and 5' Extension Tubes if you don't already have them) to still further increase table stability?:confused:

If you believe that the 2nd extension table would be a valuable asset, is your opinion based on improved "accuracy" or "repeatability"?:confused:


I quess I can take it that your answer is an unequivocal NO to all three questions.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
charlese
Platinum Member
Posts: 7501
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 10:46 pm
Location: Lancaster, CA

Post by charlese »

dusty wrote:Charlese: These were QUESTIONS not assessments.

But, if one is good, would two be better? Is it adviseable to purchase a second Extension Table (and 5' Extension Tubes if you don't already have them) to still further increase table stability?:confused:

If you believe that the 2nd extension table would be a valuable asset, is your opinion based on improved "accuracy" or "repeatability"?:confused:


I guess I can take it that your answer is an unequivocal NO to all three questions.
You are right on! NO!

Additionally, I need to point out - your origional question above (bold print) categorically omits comments from anyone not believing a 2nd extension table would be a valuable asset. That's why I asked: "What if I don't agree?" I'd still like to comment - so did!
Octogenarian's have an earned right to be a curmudgeon.
Chuck in Lancaster, CA
kalynzoo
Platinum Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 11:02 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Post by kalynzoo »

As much as I plan a project, I find that after using the drill press, I lower the SS and use the saw or bandsaw, only to find I need another set of holes someplace. Switch now is a simple process taking a minute or less. Re-setting my jig, well that's another thing. The thought of breaking down support tables takes all the fun out. KIS...keep it simple (I left out the last S so as not to be offensive.) As for the need for additonal support...my SS sets up rock steady. For the small detailed projects I enjoy I see no reason for additonal support.
Gary Kalyn
Kalynzoo Productions
Woodworking
Porter Ranch/Northridge
Los Angeles, CA
User avatar
curiousgeorge
Platinum Member
Posts: 880
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:00 am
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Post by curiousgeorge »

(I left out the last S so as not to be offensive.)
Gary,
I might suggest that if the last "S" in KISS is offensive to someone, then that someone should see a therapist. ;)
IMHO this "PC" stuff is a little out of control.:mad:
George
Ft. Worth, TX.
Go TCU Froggies
User avatar
a1gutterman
Platinum Member
Posts: 3653
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:45 am
Location: "close to" Seattle

Post by a1gutterman »

curiousgeorge wrote:...IMHO this "PC" stuff is a little out of control.:mad:
I agree completely, George!!

Gary,
How does Keep It Simple Silly grab you?

Dusty,
I do knot see how the second extension table wood make a difference in accuracy (what Nick demonstrated was a completely stable table top:D ), but if that is what you want to do, it certainly won't hurt anything, except maybe your pocket book! On the other hand, the set up that you are hypothesizing wood be a larger and more stable support for crosscutting...
Between that and your infeed and outfeed tables, maybe you could start cutting large panels on the SS.Image
Tim

Buying US made products will help keep YOUR job or retirement funds safer.
User avatar
dusty
Platinum Member
Posts: 21530
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona

Post by dusty »

charlese wrote:You are right on! NO!

Additionally, I need to point out - your origional question above (bold print) categorically omits comments from anyone not believing a 2nd extension table would be a valuable asset. That's why I asked: "What if I don't agree?" I'd still like to comment - so did!

Geez Charlese I'm sorry! But if you had stopped to answer the questions in the first place the discussion was over.

A NO would have meant - you do not believe they would be an asset.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Post Reply