Defending the SS belt sander

Moderator: admin

Ohgary
Gold Member
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 10:01 am
Location: Gardner, MA

Defending the SS belt sander

Post by Ohgary »

There is a woodworker on Youtube named Matthias Wandel who has posted dozens of how-to videos: How to build your own band saw; How to make wooden gears; How to make a pantograph router; Making a wooden toy that marbles roll around in, and many more. They are usually quite clever and fun to watch.

Recently he posted a video replying to critics that said “anyone with a hundred thousand dollars’ worth of power tools could make projects, too.” So he went through the items in his shop, one by one, explaining how he bought them on closeout, or in yard sales or picked the main components off the curb or out of a dumpster.About halfway through this video he showed off his Shopsmith belt sander. He denigrated its performance, saying, “...belt tracking is terrible and the belt tensioning doesn't even work...” Of course he went on to say he uses it quite a bit...(He bought it at a yard sale,too.)

I have not seen complaints like this in other forum posts. I thought some of the well informed members of this forum might give Mr. Wandel some advice to help him adjust his Shopsmith belt sander and improve belt tracking and belt tensioning. I was excited to see the Shopsmith logo on the sander, not so excited to hear him give it a bad review.
screenshot from Youtube
screenshot from Youtube
wandel copy.jpg (122.63 KiB) Viewed 3690 times
User avatar
algale
Platinum Member
Posts: 4841
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:13 am

Re: Defending the SS belt sander

Post by algale »

I suspect there is little chance anyone could convince that person he was wrong about much of anything. He is undeniably smart and clever but also a bit of a know-it-all who has shown himself quite unreceptive to questions about his wisdom.

My guess he doesn't have and never read the manual for the shopsmith belt sander and never tore his apart to see what was wrong with it.

By the way, he has a whole page on tool recommendations and specifically says to stay away from Shopsmith.
Gale's Law: The bigger the woodworking project, the less the mistakes show in any photo taken far enough away to show the entire project!

User avatar
rjent
Platinum Member
Posts: 2121
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 3:00 pm
Location: Hot Springs, New Mexico

Re: Defending the SS belt sander

Post by rjent »

Huh, i use to like him. :rolleyes:
Dick
1965 Mark VII S/N 407684
1951 10 ER S/N ER 44570 -- Reborn 9/16/14
1950 10 ER S/N ER 33479 Reborn July 2016
1950 10 ER S/N ER 39671
1951 jigsaw X 2
1951 !0 ER #3 in rebuild
500, Jointer, Bsaw, Bsander, Planer
2014 Mark 7 W/Lift assist - 14 4" Jointer - DC3300
And a plethora of small stuff .....

"The trouble with quotes on the Internet is that you can never know if they are genuine." - Benjamin Franklin
Ohgary
Gold Member
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 10:01 am
Location: Gardner, MA

Re: Defending the SS belt sander

Post by Ohgary »

Matthias Wandel:
woodgears.ca/beginner

"Do everything combination machines
Avoid machines that can be converted from one machine to another. The ShopSmith is a prime example of such a machine. Multi purpose machines are usually good at one or two functions, but other aspects are compromised. But the real problem is that every time you need to switch functions, you need to convert the machine. And the cost of these machines is usually high enough that you could get several single function machines for the same price."

I did not find this to be the case, but of course I bought a used one. An opportunistic purchase, as Mr. Wandel put it.
User avatar
dusty
Platinum Member
Posts: 21530
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona

Re: Defending the SS belt sander

Post by dusty »

His very own comments indict him as someone with little experience and certainly not long enough to cast dispersion upon a machine concept that has been around as long as he himself.

Reference to the User's Manual would be good.....ooops....no owner's manual for wooden machines.

BTW The Shopsmith equipment needs no defense team. It does well on its own. The people who do not know that already are people who, for whatever reason, do not want to acknowledge it.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
masonsailor2
Platinum Member
Posts: 1564
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 11:57 am
Location: Las Vegas NV

Re: Defending the SS belt sander

Post by masonsailor2 »

Ask him when the last time he cleaned it. Every time mine starts to track poorly it means it's time for a cleaning. Other than that I have two and they track perfectly.
Paul
wespex
Bronze Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 9:05 am
Location: Tulsa Area

Re: Defending the SS belt sander

Post by wespex »

On the one hand I don't like when people bash Shopsmith like they do but on the other hand I think it helps keep the prices for used Shopsmiths low which I do like very much!

Code: Select all

Tulsa, area
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1956 Mark V               (Dedicated drill press)
1992 Mark V 510           Bandsaw, Jigsaw, Jointer & Belt Sander
1995 Mark V 510           Extra Bandsaw, Jointer & Belt Sander
1994 Power Station        Extra Jointer
1961 Sawsmith RAS 700000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[/b]
User avatar
reible
Platinum Member
Posts: 11283
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:08 pm
Location: Aurora, IL

Re: Defending the SS belt sander

Post by reible »

It took me two videos of his to decide he had no idea what he was talking about, well at least for the most part. I have no desire to hear/see anything more from him nor do I want to add to his hits by going back. There are plenty of good presenters out there that I do like to watch so I check them out and follow them.

I got my belt sander early on and if I remember right that would put in 1976 or 1977. I have the crowned drum but the tension is not an issue, but you have to follow the instructions when installing new belts. If you don't then tracking can be a problem.

I want to pull mine apart and clean and lube it, not sure if I want to do some thing about the drum or not.........

Ed
{Knight of the Shopsmith} [Hero's don't wear capes, they wear dog tags]
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35598
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Re: Defending the SS belt sander

Post by JPG »

Since he has built his own versions of various tools, it stands out that he has not made himself a belt sander.



BTW tis easier by far to make a Single function tool.
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
charlese
Platinum Member
Posts: 7501
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 10:46 pm
Location: Lancaster, CA

Re: Defending the SS belt sander

Post by charlese »

I bet new idler wheels would put an end to his tracking problem.
Octogenarian's have an earned right to be a curmudgeon.
Chuck in Lancaster, CA
Post Reply