MK V Model 500 Table Weight

Forum for Maintenance and Repair topics. Feel free to ask questions or contribute.

Moderator: admin

User avatar
reible
Platinum Member
Posts: 11283
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:08 pm
Location: Aurora, IL

Re: MK V Model 500 Table Weight

Post by reible »

Fence old and new about 2#
Carriage 4#
Table 9#

Ed
jsburger wrote:Does anyone have enough parts to weigh a MK V model 500
table assembly. I would like the weight of the carriage, complete table and fence. Total is fine but individual parts also would be nice.

This is what I have from parts I have.

MK V 520 table, 520 fence and carriage.

Fence 8#
Carriage 7#
Table 26#
Total 41#

10ER table, fence and carriage.

Fence 2#
Carriage 12#
Table with solid tubes 19#
Total 33#


This is inspired from a discussion here on using a MK V table raiser on the 10ER and a question I got from a member on Skip's 10ER group. Some commented here that because the 10ER is cast iron the weight would be a problem. Well, from the above that is not true. I think the MK V 500 is close to the 10ER table weight but I would like to confirm that. The reason is that the question is which version of the MK V table raiser to use, the 500 or the 510/520.

My inclination is that the 500 version is adequate but with out the 500 table assembly weight there is no way to know. Interestingly the 500 table raiser is $3 more than the 510/520 version.

I am going to remove the table raiser from my 520 dedicated drill press and dry fit it to my 10ER dedicated drill press to prove the concept.
{Knight of the Shopsmith} [Hero's don't wear capes, they wear dog tags]
User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35428
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Re: MK V Model 500 Table Weight

Post by JPG »

Almost 1/2 the ER and more than 1/3 the 5xx.
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
User avatar
Culprit
Gold Member
Posts: 234
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 12:37 am
Location: Virginia

Re: MK V Model 500 Table Weight

Post by Culprit »

Here are the weights I could measure quickly this evening. Included are some that you didn't ask for, but I figured I would include them since they were there and somebody might want to know down the road.

Greenie main table #1 (forged and milled rail and table saw insert): 15.2 lbs

Image

Image

Greenie main table #2 (forged and milled rail and table saw insert): 14.8 lbs

Greenie fence and gray fence each 3.4 lbs.

Image

Gray main table with bolted on rail and table saw insert and a plastic bracket that I think is where a saw guard would attach: 12.8 lbs

Image

Image

Greenie aux table with forged and milled rail: 5.4 lbs

Image

Gray aux table with bolted on rail: 7.2 lbs

Image
1955 Greenie, modified to be reversible
ERLover
Platinum Member
Posts: 3914
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 10:19 pm
Location: Greenie and Goldie Country not to metion the WI Badgers!

Re: MK V Model 500 Table Weight

Post by ERLover »

Culprit wrote:Here are the weights I could measure quickly this evening. Included are some that you didn't ask for, but I figured I would include them since they were there and somebody might want to know down the road.

Greenie main table #1 (forged and milled rail and table saw insert): 15.2 lbs

Image

Image

Greenie main table #2 (forged and milled rail and table saw insert): 14.8 lbs

Greenie fence and gray fence each 3.4 lbs.

Image

Gray main table with bolted on rail and table saw insert and a plastic bracket that I think is where a saw guard would attach: 12.8 lbs

Image

Image

Greenie aux table with forged and milled rail: 5.4 lbs

Image

Gray aux table with bolted on rail: 7.2 lbs

Image
How and what did you weigh them on?
KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE EQUALS WISDOM. Albert Einstein
The Greatness officially starts :D :D :D :D :D :D
Greenie, Grayling, SS stand alone BS and BS SPT, jointer and belt sander, 3 Ers with Speed Changers. I think those 3 cover my ER needs, and space for them. :)
ERLover
Platinum Member
Posts: 3914
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 10:19 pm
Location: Greenie and Goldie Country not to metion the WI Badgers!

Re: MK V Model 500 Table Weight

Post by ERLover »

Where is Dusty on this when we need him :D
KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE EQUALS WISDOM. Albert Einstein
The Greatness officially starts :D :D :D :D :D :D
Greenie, Grayling, SS stand alone BS and BS SPT, jointer and belt sander, 3 Ers with Speed Changers. I think those 3 cover my ER needs, and space for them. :)
User avatar
Culprit
Gold Member
Posts: 234
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 12:37 am
Location: Virginia

Re: MK V Model 500 Table Weight

Post by Culprit »

ERLover, I weighed them on our digital bathroom scale. It displays tenths of a pound, but only ever gives a result that is an even number in the tenths place so I think the precision is really one fifth of a pound. And fortunately my wife did not see me carrying the scale out to the garage. :)
1955 Greenie, modified to be reversible
User avatar
admin
Gold Member
Posts: 378
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 1:14 pm
Location: Dayton, OH
Contact:

Re: MK V Model 500 Table Weight

Post by admin »

There were changes in the Mark V in 1972 that would affect the lift assist. Some of these older (pre-1972) machines may have been upgraded with a PowerPro headstock and would require the stronger gas cylinder. The lift-assist noted is to support these older machines that have been upgraded.

With almost every machine being upgrade-able and upgrades often being done in different sequences, it does all get complicated covering it with accessory versions.
jsburger wrote:
ERLover wrote:John,
Maybe a simple "chat" with the MS could get the answer on what the difference is and which one to get. Last fall when they where on sale, I wanted to get one for an ER in DP mode, which I have not installed yet, you said get the one for the 520. I was concerned about the ER weight also. Oh wait, it is here at moms on the FP hearth in the box, let me look.
Packing/shipping list sez, item 556335; Table Lifter (510, 520, MK7).
I am sure the difference is in the the spring cylinder vis-a-vis the different weights. Just as the conventional lift assist is different than the lift assist for the Power Pro. The Power Pro head stock weighs more than the conventional head stock.

I am sure CS will not discuss anything about the 10ER. Interestingly SS has a 10ER manual for sale.

OOPS!! Things get interesting here.

http://www.shopsmith.com/ownersite/cata ... assist.htm

SS is talking about the Power Pro before and after 1972. That page is all over the place.

ADMIN!!!!!!!!
Shopsmith I.T.
User avatar
reible
Platinum Member
Posts: 11283
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:08 pm
Location: Aurora, IL

Re: MK V Model 500 Table Weight

Post by reible »

The only change I can think of that would have a major effect is the diameter of the bench tubes on some of the older machines. Can anyone think of another issue?

Ed
{Knight of the Shopsmith} [Hero's don't wear capes, they wear dog tags]
User avatar
jsburger
Platinum Member
Posts: 6551
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 4:06 pm
Location: Hooper, UT

Re: MK V Model 500 Table Weight

Post by jsburger »

admin wrote:There were changes in the Mark V in 1972 that would affect the lift assist. Some of these older (pre-1972) machines may have been upgraded with a PowerPro headstock and would require the stronger gas cylinder. The lift-assist noted is to support these older machines that have been upgraded.

With almost every machine being upgrade-able and upgrades often being done in different sequences, it does all get complicated covering it with accessory versions.
jsburger wrote:
ERLover wrote:John,
Maybe a simple "chat" with the MS could get the answer on what the difference is and which one to get. Last fall when they where on sale, I wanted to get one for an ER in DP mode, which I have not installed yet, you said get the one for the 520. I was concerned about the ER weight also. Oh wait, it is here at moms on the FP hearth in the box, let me look.
Packing/shipping list sez, item 556335; Table Lifter (510, 520, MK7).
I am sure the difference is in the the spring cylinder vis-a-vis the different weights. Just as the conventional lift assist is different than the lift assist for the Power Pro. The Power Pro head stock weighs more than the conventional head stock.

I am sure CS will not discuss anything about the 10ER. Interestingly SS has a 10ER manual for sale.

OOPS!! Things get interesting here.

http://www.shopsmith.com/ownersite/cata ... assist.htm

SS is talking about the Power Pro before and after 1972. That page is all over the place.

ADMIN!!!!!!!!

Obviously I hadn't thought about an older machine with an upgraded Power Pro head stock. It makes perfect sense now. :o
John & Mary Burger
Eagle's Lair Woodshop
Hooper, UT
User avatar
jsburger
Platinum Member
Posts: 6551
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 4:06 pm
Location: Hooper, UT

Re: MK V Model 500 Table Weight

Post by jsburger »

Thanks guys for the weights. It looks like the table raiser for the 510/20 is the one that is needed for the 10ER since the 500 table and carriage is lighter than the 10ER.
John & Mary Burger
Eagle's Lair Woodshop
Hooper, UT
Post Reply