First post -Old user

Forum for Maintenance and Repair topics. Feel free to ask questions or contribute.

Moderator: admin

User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35600
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Re: First post -Old user

Post by JPG »

You might not believe this, but I(not having an 'original') am very likely to have a misunderstanding. What JSB says is likely more accurate.

Actually I think I was wrong.
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
User avatar
everettdavis
Platinum Member
Posts: 2163
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 11:49 am
Location: Lubbock, TX

Re: First post -Old user

Post by everettdavis »

The major difference to me, and I own both, is the Cast Iron Bed on the Pro Planner opposed to the covered aluminum of the Shopsmith Mounted one.

Next difference is the 5,750 RPM of the Pro Planer opposed to the 3000 - 4100 variable cutter-head speed.

Third would be the 1 3/4 HP of the Pro Planner opposed to the 1 1/8 via the Headstock powered unit.

Most important to me is not having to lift and set up the Shopsmith Mounted one.

You can convert to a stand, and add a bigger motor, but you still have the aluminum bed, so in that sense it is not a Pro Planer per se.
Planer Specs 2003.png
Planer Specs 2003.png (806.39 KiB) Viewed 2906 times
Both are very good. The in-feed roller and chute upgrades are well worth it.

Each performs well. I am considering dedicating a unit to mount mine, and have Sanding Disk and Table Set-up on the other end most of the time.

Everett

The attachment is from a 2003 Catalog back when I bought my 50th Anniversary Edition 520 which I use a good bit.
User avatar
jsburger
Platinum Member
Posts: 6585
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 4:06 pm
Location: Hooper, UT

Re: First post -Old user

Post by jsburger »

everettdavis wrote:The major difference to me, and I own both, is the Cast Iron Bed on the Pro Planner opposed to the covered aluminum of the Shopsmith Mounted one.

Next difference is the 5,750 RPM of the Pro Planer opposed to the 3000 - 4100 variable cutter-head speed.

Third would be the 1 3/4 HP of the Pro Planner opposed to the 1 1/8 via the Headstock powered unit.

Most important to me is not having to lift and set up the Shopsmith Mounted one.

You can convert to a stand, and add a bigger motor, but you still have the aluminum bed, so in that sense it is not a Pro Planer per se.
Planer Specs 2003.png

Both are very good. The in-feed roller and chute upgrades are well worth it.

Each performs well. I am considering dedicating a unit to mount mine, and have Sanding Disk and Table Set-up on the other end most of the time.

Everett

The attachment is from a 2003 Catalog back when I bought my 50th Anniversary Edition 520 which I use a good bit.
Unfortunately the Pro Planer and comparisons are no longer to be found on the SS site. Neither are the power stands.
John & Mary Burger
Eagle's Lair Woodshop
Hooper, UT
dgreen810
Gold Member
Posts: 478
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2013 3:17 pm
Location: Tulsa Area

Re: First post -Old user

Post by dgreen810 »

Before you order browse this thread

http://www.shopsmith.com/ss_forum/viewt ... 01#p217401

Don G.
Post Reply