Still Trying to Fully Understand
Moderator: admin
- dusty
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 21530
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
- Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona
Still Trying to Fully Understand
the sheaves (operation of) in a Mark V and the pulleys in the Mark 7.
Does everyone agree that the Mark V sheaves are 5" and that this image (taken from a thread on this forum) accurately represents the belt position on the drive sheave when set at high speed (5200rpm).
and
Another simple question. Does the motor normally operate at 3450rpm or 3570rpm?
My issue is that I cannot reconcile pulley diameters on conjunction with the speed charts that are provided by Shopsmith. I do understand that there are some differing charts. I am assuming for this exercise that the idler sheave should move between 1120rpm to 8320rpm.
Yes! The numbers will not be exact and probably not consistent.
Does everyone agree that the Mark V sheaves are 5" and that this image (taken from a thread on this forum) accurately represents the belt position on the drive sheave when set at high speed (5200rpm).
and
Another simple question. Does the motor normally operate at 3450rpm or 3570rpm?
My issue is that I cannot reconcile pulley diameters on conjunction with the speed charts that are provided by Shopsmith. I do understand that there are some differing charts. I am assuming for this exercise that the idler sheave should move between 1120rpm to 8320rpm.
Yes! The numbers will not be exact and probably not consistent.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Re: Still Trying to Fully Understand
I don't have a motor out to look at the ID plate on it, but in the US with 120v and 60cycle power, the two standards for motors are 1725 and 3450 rpms. Anything other than that would be have to be made non-standard.
- JPG
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 35600
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
- Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)
Re: Still Trying to Fully Understand
What an excellent time consuming trip to lord only knows where(if indeed a destination is actually arrived at).
First of all an induction motor does not operate at a fixed speed. The resultant speed is a function of many factors with the major one being mechanical loading. The rated rpm includes usually the assumption of being fully loaded at the rated horsepower.
Now about v-belts. What is the effective 'diameter' when it is running on a pulley. It is somewhere between the outer(wide) and inner(narrow) portion of the belt.
Often (in the past) the question has been raised as to why the dial has letters rather than actual rpm numbers. As Nick once replied 'there is a lot of stuff going on there'. Accurate numbers simply are not consistant when all is taken into consideration including belt wear(that effective diameter thing again).
In spite of this the Mark VII did use actual numbers. They only got away with that before inexpensive tachometers became accessible.
So good luck Dusty. I think yer chasing yer tail. A ± 20% deviation is IMHO to be expected.
Now which of those differing speed charts are you attempting to reconcile?
Oh! BTW the idler pulley will rotate between 1120 and 8320 rpm.
First of all an induction motor does not operate at a fixed speed. The resultant speed is a function of many factors with the major one being mechanical loading. The rated rpm includes usually the assumption of being fully loaded at the rated horsepower.
Now about v-belts. What is the effective 'diameter' when it is running on a pulley. It is somewhere between the outer(wide) and inner(narrow) portion of the belt.
Often (in the past) the question has been raised as to why the dial has letters rather than actual rpm numbers. As Nick once replied 'there is a lot of stuff going on there'. Accurate numbers simply are not consistant when all is taken into consideration including belt wear(that effective diameter thing again).
In spite of this the Mark VII did use actual numbers. They only got away with that before inexpensive tachometers became accessible.
So good luck Dusty. I think yer chasing yer tail. A ± 20% deviation is IMHO to be expected.
Now which of those differing speed charts are you attempting to reconcile?
Oh! BTW the idler pulley will rotate between 1120 and 8320 rpm.
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝
Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝
Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
- dusty
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 21530
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
- Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona
Re: Still Trying to Fully Understand
Thank you for the response. The plate on my two motors both read 3450rpm as well. The motor (AO Smith) in my Shorty runs at 3570rpm.garys wrote:I don't have a motor out to look at the ID plate on it, but in the US with 120v and 60cycle power, the two standards for motors are 1725 and 3450 rpms. Anything other than that would be have to be made non-standard.
I am through "chancing my tail" for now. I believe that I now understand the operation of the sheaves much better than simply knowing that they are variable pulleys. I also better understand the apparent inconsistencies in the Mark V speed chart that I have.
This was a fun and educational journey for me. I find that no matter how much I use these machines there is always something more to learn.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
- JPG
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 35600
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
- Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)
Re: Still Trying to Fully Understand
Nicely done sketchup work. I am curious what the eccentric positioning was when the shaft spacing was measured.
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝
Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝
Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
- dusty
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 21530
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
- Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona
Re: Still Trying to Fully Understand
I don't know but I really doubt that it is significant but to this machine and even then could be made different simply by adjusting belt tension.JPG wrote:Nicely done sketchup work. I am curious what the eccentric positioning was when the shaft spacing was measured.
What I did confirm for myself is that whatever amount the belt moves in one pulley it moves the same in the other. On my machine (The Shorty), the belt (when AT HIGH SPEED) is almost exactly the same distance from the edge of the other pulley when at low speed. This suggests to me that the change is linear for any given set of pulleys and belt. The speed chart have does not give me that impression. I am unable to closely match the speed chart but I suspect that is because the motor in The Shorty runs so much faster (3450rpm vs 3570rpm).
Oh, I also learned that my opening questions were not taken seriously because no one challenged the fact that the pulleys are 5" in diameter. They are actually 5 1/2".
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Re: Still Trying to Fully Understand
Just curious. Are you saying that the motor plate on your shorty says 3450 but it actually runs at 3570?dusty wrote:Thank you for the response. The plate on my two motors both read 3450rpm as well. The motor (AO Smith) in my Shorty runs at 3570rpm.garys wrote:I don't have a motor out to look at the ID plate on it, but in the US with 120v and 60cycle power, the two standards for motors are 1725 and 3450 rpms. Anything other than that would be have to be made non-standard.
I am through "chancing my tail" for now. I believe that I now understand the operation of the sheaves much better than simply knowing that they are variable pulleys. I also better understand the apparent inconsistencies in the Mark V speed chart that I have.
Sheaves, Shaft and Belt 2.png
This was a fun and educational journey for me. I find that no matter how much I use these machines there is always something more to learn.
John & Mary Burger
Eagle's Lair Woodshop
Hooper, UT
Eagle's Lair Woodshop
Hooper, UT
- dusty
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 21530
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
- Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona
Re: Still Trying to Fully Understand
Yup.jsburger wrote:Just curious. Are you saying that the motor plate on your shorty says 3450 but it actually runs at 3570?dusty wrote:Thank you for the response. The plate on my two motors both read 3450rpm as well. The motor (AO Smith) in my Shorty runs at 3570rpm.garys wrote:I don't have a motor out to look at the ID plate on it, but in the US with 120v and 60cycle power, the two standards for motors are 1725 and 3450 rpms. Anything other than that would be have to be made non-standard.
I am through "chancing my tail" for now. I believe that I now understand the operation of the sheaves much better than simply knowing that they are variable pulleys. I also better understand the apparent inconsistencies in the Mark V speed chart that I have.
Sheaves, Shaft and Belt 2.png
This was a fun and educational journey for me. I find that no matter how much I use these machines there is always something more to learn.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
Re: Still Trying to Fully Understand
And the other motor?dusty wrote:Yup.jsburger wrote:Just curious. Are you saying that the motor plate on your shorty says 3450 but it actually runs at 3570?dusty wrote:
Thank you for the response. The plate on my two motors both read 3450rpm as well. The motor (AO Smith) in my Shorty runs at 3570rpm.
I am through "chancing my tail" for now. I believe that I now understand the operation of the sheaves much better than simply knowing that they are variable pulleys. I also better understand the apparent inconsistencies in the Mark V speed chart that I have.
Sheaves, Shaft and Belt 2.png
This was a fun and educational journey for me. I find that no matter how much I use these machines there is always something more to learn.
John & Mary Burger
Eagle's Lair Woodshop
Hooper, UT
Eagle's Lair Woodshop
Hooper, UT
- JPG
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 35600
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
- Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)
Re: Still Trying to Fully Understand
I had no doubt you can accurately measure the od of the pulley so no response was needed.dusty wrote: . . .
What I did confirm for myself is that whatever amount the belt moves in one pulley it moves the same in the other. On my machine (The Shorty), the belt (when AT HIGH SPEED) is almost exactly the same distance from the edge of the other pulley when at low speed. This suggests to me that the change is linear for any given set of pulleys and belt. Equal and opposite, but not necessarily linear.
Oh, I also learned that my opening questions were not taken seriously because no one challenged the fact that the pulleys are 5" in diameter. They are actually 5 1/2".
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝
Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝
Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange