please help

mickyd · Post by **mickyd** » Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:10 pm

joedw00 wrote:Did anyone notice the date this was posted? 9-10-2006 , I wonder if he ever got registered, and found out what was wrong.

The first 4 posts show as 2006.

Did we go back in time? I think forum member reible is going to have to answer since he is one of the 4 posts and the only active member name I recognize.

beeg · Post by **beeg** » Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:24 pm

More than likely since the post was near the beginning of this forum. An unregistered could post, and has since been changed?

lv2wdwrk · Post by **lv2wdwrk** » Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:28 pm

mickyd wrote:The first 4 posts show as 2006. Did we go back in time? I think forum member reible is going to have to answer since he is one of the 4 posts and the only active member name I recognize.

Ed In Tampa and Bruce are both still active.

mbcabinetmaker · Post by **mbcabinetmaker** » Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:07 pm

This reminds me of Hello is anybody there. This is what happens when you go digging up the past!:D

Mark

JPG · Post by **JPG** » Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:12 pm

DUSTY: The next(and all subsequent) time you encounter a 30 MONTH old thread, Let it Be!:D I am amazed we did NOT learn anything LAST week!(Hello anybody there?):rolleyes:

dusty · Post by **dusty** » Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:22 pm

JPG40504 wrote:DUSTY: The next(and all subsequent) time you encounter a 30 MONTH old thread, Let it Be!:D I am amazed we did NOT learn anything LAST week!(Hello anybody there?):rolleyes:

I'm sorry to have taxed the thought process with an old question but I think that it is probably still a valid question. There are a lot of "olde" unanswered questions on this forum, Hmmmm.

As far as what I SHOULD HAVE LEARNED last week - I don't know what you are referring to.

JPG · Post by **JPG** » Tue Jun 02, 2009 7:50 pm

dusty wrote:I'm sorry to have taxed the thought process with an old question but I think that it is probably still a valid question. There are a lot of "olde" unanswered questions on this forum, Hmmmm.

As far as what I SHOULD HAVE LEARNED last week - I don't know what you are referring to.

Last weeks lesson: Look at the thread posting date so as to realize when it was 'started'. That with dates of the subsequent posts will indicate whether ANY response is likely to be read by the original author!;)

BTW I think the 'forum was 'new' then and unregistered 'guests' were (THEN) allowed to post is a MOST likely VALID explanation!:)

Peace be with you!