Calculate Compound Miter Joints

Moderator: admin

User avatar
JPG
Platinum Member
Posts: 35430
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: Lexington, Ky (TAMECAT territory)

Post by JPG »

dusty wrote:Not to nitpick but actually my need to average the numbers does not indicate non linearity. If non linearity was the issue, each and every reading taken would be off by some amount always in the same direction. Your input shows that. As you progress from 0 degrees to 45 degrees the sine increases from .01795 to .70710]it never jumps backward[/U].

Now you did not see my actual numbers so I know you were not made aware that the numbers were inconsistent but you did jump to your conclusion without checking.

Now, having said all of that - when I noticed that the numbers were inconsistent, I made some modifications to my collection methods. I increased the size of the adjustment know and created a rudimentary scale that better allows me to turn the knob in more consistent increments.

With the modified knob, 1 revolution of the knob results in a .1 degree change in table tilt with only occasional deviation. I contribute that deviation to the Wixey - remembering that the Wixey is accurate to .1 degree. I have retested this from 0 degrees to 35 degrees. I am satisfied that this works sufficiently well for all of my tilting table needs. Enough is enough.

[ATTACH]4574[/ATTACH][ATTACH]4575[/ATTACH]
Interesting! You have critiqued a discussion re .01 and .001 degree accuracy with a device accurate to .1 degree(+-.05 degree).:rolleyes:

BTW did you keep the threaded rod at a 90 degree angle to the way tubes? It would have to move horizontally parallel to the way tubes.

A way(maybe impractical) to compensate for the 'non-linearity' would be to position the threaded rod at the same angle as the table but in the opposite direction. This would cause the rod length adjustment to be tangential to the arc created by the table rotating thus providing a 'constant' tangential distance moved independent of the angle. [Think rod ALWAYS perpendicular to the table!]
╔═══╗
╟JPG ╢
╚═══╝

Goldie(Bought New SN 377425)/4" jointer/6" beltsander/12" planer/stripsander/bandsaw/powerstation /Scroll saw/Jig saw /Craftsman 10" ras/Craftsman 6" thicknessplaner/ Dayton10"tablesaw(restoredfromneighborstrashpile)/ Mark VII restoration in 'progress'/ 10
E[/size](SN E3779) restoration in progress, a 510 on the back burner and a growing pile of items to be eventually returned to useful life. - aka Red Grange
User avatar
navycop
Gold Member
Posts: 368
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: Virginia Beach, VA

Post by navycop »

[quote="cowboyplus"]I have written a program to calculate compound miter joints.

You can test and use it here.

Will this work-no matter how long the pieces are? i.e. an 8 sided sandbox.
Mark V 520, Ryobi 12" mitersaw, Delta 10" tablesaw, DC 3300.
Mike
User avatar
cowboyplus
Gold Member
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:31 pm
Location: Colorado

Post by cowboyplus »

navycop wrote:

Will this work-no matter how long the pieces are? i.e. an 8 sided sandbox.

Yes and it will calculate the corner to corner distance relative to the radius, ie. if you want a 6' diameter sand box with 8 sides the sides would be 3 * .77 = 2.31" corner to corner. You can use inside corners for inside diameter or outside corners for outside diameter.

.
User avatar
dlbristol
Platinum Member
Posts: 874
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 4:57 pm
Location: Collbran, Colorado

Post by dlbristol »

This is a great exercise in applied math. I read with great interest as you bounce the theory off the application and make things work. Some where guys there is a math teacher smiling! I hope someday some of my students can use as many skills as you guys can.
Saw dust heals many wounds. RLTW
Dave
Post Reply