Mark V 500 vs 510 dust extraction efficiency

This is a forum for intermediate to advanced woodworkers. Show off your projects or share your ideas.

Moderator: admin

Post Reply
cjacobus1
Silver Member
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:55 pm

Mark V 500 vs 510 dust extraction efficiency

Post by cjacobus1 »

Does anyone have experience with both the 500 and 510/520 where they could relate comparative dust extraction efficiencies? I'm disappointed with my 500s. If I upgrade to a 520 will I still find significant saw dust down the front of the machine?

Chuck
tryinhard
Gold Member
Posts: 119
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:16 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Post by tryinhard »

You mention a lot of dust. Which of the saw guards do you have? Is your lower saw guard metal with a 1.5" hose connection, a plastic lower guard with 1.5" hose connection with plastic tie bar guard, or plastic lower guard with two hose connections?
Mike
Jupiter, FL
User avatar
dusty
Platinum Member
Posts: 21481
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:52 am
Location: Tucson (Wildcat Country), Arizona

Post by dusty »

cjacobus1 wrote:Does anyone have experience with both the 500 and 510/520 where they could relate comparative dust extraction efficiencies? I'm disappointed with my 500s. If I upgrade to a 520 will I still find significant saw dust down the front of the machine?

Chuck


No, a 520 upgrade will not eliminate dust but it will certainly improve on the situation. This thread discusses a mod to the lower dust collector to help improve that.
"Making Sawdust Safely"
Dusty
Sent from my Dell XPS using Firefox.
cjacobus1
Silver Member
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:55 pm

500 vs 520 Dust

Post by cjacobus1 »

tryinhard wrote:You mention a lot of dust. Which of the saw guards do you have? Is your lower saw guard metal with a 1.5" hose connection, a plastic lower guard with 1.5" hose connection with plastic tie bar guard, or plastic lower guard with two hose connections?
I bought it new from Shopsmith. It's the plastic one with 1- 2 1/4" hose connection.

ChuckJ
User avatar
kd6vpe
Platinum Member
Posts: 585
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:53 pm
Location: Owasso, Oklahoma
Contact:

Post by kd6vpe »

I have had both and they are both about the same. Dusty's post takes you to some of the modifications that helped. I only did part of them and saw little improvement on the saw chips but I am sure the dust itself was less.
SS 500 upgraded to 510; SS bandsaw; SS jointer
SS Oscillating Drum Sander; Universal Lathe Rest;
lathe duplicatior, shaper fence and shapers; SS Belt
Sander
Jim
www.youtube.com/kd6vpe
oldc6
Gold Member
Posts: 233
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:22 pm
Location: central minnesota

Post by oldc6 »

I have a 500 with the small port on the back of the guard. sawdust all over the place, if you tape up some of the holes it is some better. bought a used 510 this summer... hook it up to 4 inch dust collector , i would say about 90 percent better still some dust on tubes but, no big pile on floor.. use the sanding disk with this setup and about zero dust. i would think you would be quite happy with dust collection on the 520 upgrade.....
Post Reply